9 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCoC Success form in German! Now to contact TFL.
Leading reported evidence
Check yesterday and i am exempt so all good
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I sent it in to TFL and checked yesterday and I am exempt so all good.
Leading evidence: 'Check yesterday and i am exempt so all good' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check yesterday and i am exempt so all good' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I can now use a cut through to the A3 at Tolworth and then joining the M25 two exits from Junction 8 where I normally get on.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T191851Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi All,
My Certificate of conformity came through after nearly a month of waiting. The form is in German and makes interesting reading, I do have a little German so interesting to learn some new car related language.
I will scan it off and send it to TFL and see what happens!
All the best,
Phil.
Be prepared for them to throw it back saying that the document is not from the manufacturer...............!
Oh how we laughed (that was me and the very helpful lady from Porsche UK) when TFL said that to me in their 2nd rejection of my 996.
Never give up, never surrender to TFL!!
Received my CoC last Wednesday, just inside the 28 days I'd been told by Porsche to allow. Uploaded it to the TfL website together with the cover letter from Porsche and a scan of my V5C. The following day my car's status on TfL's website was updated showing my car meets the ULEZ standards - handy as I went to car meets in Wimbledon and Parsons Green at the weekend!
Incidently my March 98 Carrera's NOx level shows 0.063 g/km.
When I submitted mine I drew their attention to the relevant clause number (46.1) for NOx emissions to save them having to argue about translations. No problem getting it accepted.
Got it back from TfL in days. Took CAZ a bit longer to accept it and turn it round for the other cities (about 6 weeks IIRC) with ULEZ but got there in the end.
Good luck Phil !
That’s it Monty, if the car doesn’t meet TFL stipulated Emissions it’s £12.50 a day to drive in the zone.
Edinburgh got a similar thing haven’t they ?
Just a heads up , I did the whole process of getting TFL compliant for the 996. Thinking that the DVLA would have updated all the the relevant bodies, nope, when I did the NC500 we went to Edinburgh upon my return home I was greeted by a ULEZ fine. I paid it then went through the process of complaining and having their database updated, I got a full refund.
I sent it in to TFL and checked yesterday and I am exempt so all good. I can now use a cut through to the A3 at Tolworth and then joining the M25 two exits from Junction 8 where I normally get on.
I';m not sure about Edinburgh and will check. I am going to aplly for Edinburgh, Birmingham and Bristol, not that I have plans but we might take the car there. It's a shame it isn't all joined up but very glad to have compliance in London as I am 1 mile from the Cameras.
You need to do TfL for London ULEZ and CAZ for England/Wales ULEZ cites and Scotland for their cities as 3 separate applications. To date I've only got TfL and CAZ sorted, not tried Scotland yet.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
