9 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHClutch
Leading reported evidence
Check whether the carpet was caught
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
and have you checked whether the carpet was caught before and now the clutch pedal has freed itself...
Leading evidence: 'Check whether the carpet was caught' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check whether the carpet was caught' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I didn't think you used your clutch on track days.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
At your age you think you'd have learned how to use the clutch :wink:
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T070717Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
When pulling away last night the clutch suddenly seemed to jerk and I stalled the car. The clutch now seems very very light. It is not slipping at all even when being driven hard.
Am i right in thinking that a new clutch is imminent?
Migration info. Legacy thread was 63609
Live with it Dave,
The judder is clutch wear, could be a flat spot on the Flywheel.
If it aint fouling the gears or slipping, live with it till it does.
Mine was the same at 14k miles, and has detoriated maybe by 10% in the last 11k miles, and that includes 4 track days.
Migration info. Legacy thread was 63611
Dave, normally the clutch gets heavier as it wears which you probably don't notice as it deteriorates over time. When I had the new clutch in mine, I couldn't believe how light it was.
Migration info. Legacy thread was 63698
I'm glad I don't have to worry about them!
I was on the hill approaching Stow on Sunday (1 in 6-8) and the bloke int he C4S cab was burning his clutch to bits. It smelt so bad. He was having to rev the ass off it to get it to move - I almost felt guilty being in a tip! :twisted:
Migration info. Legacy thread was 63717
"When pulling away last night the clutch suddenly seemed to jerk and I stalled the car. The clutch now seems very very light. It is not slipping at all even when being driven hard"
maybe after some practice you won't stall your car.....
and have you checked whether the carpet was caught before and now the clutch pedal has freed itself...
of course I'm being flippant.
As long as it works OK, if it feels light, then that's good, isn't it?
Migration info. Legacy thread was 63820
As previously said, it is when it gets heavy that problems are afoot. Also stalling in reverse is a sign that the clutch is on the way out.
Migration info. Legacy thread was 63827
