12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHTalivan detection
Leading reported evidence
Check some of the specialist sites
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I've tried checking some of the specialist sites but cant get the answer.
Leading evidence: 'Check some of the specialist sites' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check some of the specialist sites' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
How can it do that when mobile sites are changing constantly?
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
last time I updated (4 weeks ago) it didn't add mobile sites or do I have to change some settings?
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
(if however you get an active laser sensor for your garage door you will in theory be able to use a "jammer" with impunity [
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T191851Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
My local constabulary must have purchased a new toy, cos I've passed the mobile speed camera 3 times in 2 weeks. This weekend I was at full chat, wrong side of the road, safely overtaking a couple of sunday drivers. Its a fair (?) cop guv ....
Can these blessed things be detected?? I have a roadangel but that just does fixed units. Do these vans give out detectable laser signals? I've tried checking some of the specialist sites but cant get the answer.
Andrew,
My Road Angel has always been able to tell me whether I am coming up to a mobile or fixed site and as far as I was aware this was a standard feature.
My road angel does'nt download mobile sites either. How can it do that when mobile sites are changing constantly? What it does do is download 'black spots' which may be areas where you find mobile cameras but there are plenty of other mobile camera sites in my area which it does'nt identify. My road angel supposedly has laser detection as well but I would'nt trust that either as, by the time it warns you, you've been zapped anyway. The only way to avoid mobile camera detection is with a jammer which will be illegal shortly or, of course, sticking to the limit!
Mobile sites are actually fixed sites visited in random order. Each site requires planning permission and should be listed on your local authority web site.
Also from the Road Angel site:
With new fully integrated GPS and Laser technology, ROAD ANGEL alerts you to: accident blackspots, safety cameras (including Gatso,TruVelo, SPECS, Watchman, Speedcurb, DS2) and mobile laser guns; with an audible, visual and voice alerts.
My RoadAngel tells me about mobile sites.
You can also put a site into your own personal database if you press the appropriate set of buttons. You need to be at the site, though, and the combination is fun at 30mph...!
Actually the jammer is already illegal. It is the active radar detector which is due to become illegal shortly if the government and the traffic taliban get their way.
(if however you get an active laser sensor for your garage door you will in theory be able to use a "jammer" with impunity [
] )
The sad fact is by the time a laser detector picks up a signal it is 99% certain that you have already been done!! Unlike radar the beam of light is so thin & tightly focused that you rarely pick up any refection until the beam comes for you!
You can get an add on lazer detector for the road angel, or a separate radar/lazer detector, but neither will likely save you.
The only thing that DOES appear to work is the Lazer jammer, but as David says this is illegal...... if they find it, I do know of certain owners of Pork who have used them for years without problems, but I suppose it is still a risk!!
As also mentioned, car manufacturers are now selling new cars with "coming home function" which will open garage doors & also jam lazer guns........sounds like a damn good idea, but only available on 997/987 series Pork!
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
