fullymatted.
Back to search
Planet-9

✅ Final Alignment Values (R springs on B4 shocks with CSC7 tires) on my 987.1 S

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
4 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH✅ Final Alignment Values (R springs on B4 shocks with CSC7 tires) on my 987.1 S

Leading reported evidence

Run say -2.0 in the front

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

There should be more understeer than if I was running say -2.0 in the front, but it's not obvious, even on spirited drives.

✅ Final Alignment Values (R springs on B4 shocks with CSC7 tires) on my 987.1 S
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Run say -2.0 in the front' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run say -2.0 in the front' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 4 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run say -2.0 in the front

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

There should be more understeer than if I was running say -2.0 in the front, but it's not obvious, even on spirited drives.

✅ Final Alignment Values (R springs on B4 shocks with CSC7 tires) on my 987.1 S
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

4 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Planet-9: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T191851Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

Rear Camber: −1.84° / −1.84° Toe: +0.11° / +0.11° Front Camber: −1.00° / −1.02° Caster: 7.65° / 7.65° (lucky on that one!) Toe: +0.04° / +0.04° I think it’s the perfect set up for our local B roads, with Cayman R front precision, handling capability but a bit more damping compliance and rear stability than a R.

POST 2Original post

Hey @ecarca , those look like great numbers for a spirited B-road setup—and you're right to be happy about that perfectly even caster! What specifically were you trying to improve on from your previous alignment? I'm sure others would be curious to hear how the car feels with these changes.

POST 3Original post

What I’ve generally seen on our cars is that front negative camber is greater than rear. Is there a reason this is the other way? It’s just a guess, but I would think that the car would understeer quite a bit?

POST 4Original post

I could maybe have gone more aggressive with camber in the front, but the point is I am not optimizing it for track but for the road, and wanted to keep a balance similar to factory, but more oriented towards Cayman R stock values, still taking into account the following. I have lower ride height than a stock S, thanks to the R springs, and more compliant shocks. I should get the sharp turn in with the toe. Also the caster as it is (not adjustable) should get me more dynamic camber and more front grip. Last, with the CSC7 tires , I need to be in a sort of sweet spot (not too low but also not too high), they take less than say PS4S. So think about it as a system. There should be more understeer than if I was running say -2.0 in the front, but it's not obvious, even on spirited drives. And I think -1.8 or -2 or anything above -1.4 or -1.5 would not suit the CSC7. As it is, it's really quite able. Last we also have several quite wet months with heavy rain, and I believe it will still perform really well in the wet. To be evaluated soon All in all, I don't think I would really get more grip, for my particular setup with more front camber. That would probably reduce stability, negatively impact tire wear and not necessarily improve the turn in because the toe and caster should already achieve that. It's quite theoretical and I hope it makes sense. I don't really push that hard on public roads, but so far it seems to make sense behind the wheel.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.