7 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHTechart Wheel Problem
Leading reported evidence
Install these wheels (19in x 11in 5 spokes et52)
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
Tech 9 have previously fitted these wheels (19in x 11in 5 spokes et52) on the rear of non facelift 3.4 y reg cab with no probs.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Unless you have a camber gauge it would be difficult to check accurately, but a plumb bob, careful measurement, and some simple trigonometry might give you a good approximation.
Leading evidence: 'Install these wheels (19in x 11in 5 spokes et52)' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check accurately' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Unless you have a camber gauge it would be difficult to check accurately, but a plumb bob, careful measurement, and some simple trigonometry might give you a good approximation.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Check accurately
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Unless you have a camber gauge it would be difficult to check accurately, but a plumb bob, careful measurement, and some simple trigonometry might give you a good approximation.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T181445Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
can anyone help????
i have just purchased some techart wheels from tech 9 and am currently having some probs.
Tech 9 have previously fitted these wheels (19in x 11in 5 spokes et52) on the rear of non facelift 3.4 y reg cab with no probs.
mine is a 3.6 2002 C2 (well, v late 2001) model. the wheel are sticking out about 10mm outside the arches!
it has techart suspension fitted, and the camber set to help the wheels into the arches (cant remember if thats neg of pos camber!)
the fronts are A1 - look sexy although there off until i can have tem all matching!!
any ideas , any thing is helpful - techart in germany dont seem to have a clue
Joe
Make sure there are no spacers fitted to your car. Porsche allow for (I think) up to 10mm spacers to improve handling with standard wheels - maybe someone fitted them. This would take the TechArt wheels outside the arch as they have a bigger effective offset. Chuck the spacers out and all will be well!!
Ian W
What offset were the standard wheels - form recolleciton they should be around ET50, in whcih case the techart ones should be 2mm further into the arch than the old ones - something not right there at all.
If they have done this to make the car look right cosmetically, they definitely don't know what they are doing! Putting too much negative camber will upset the handling and cause excessive tyre wear.
If you would like a copy of the Technical Service Bulletin which shows the offsets of the 17" and 18" wheels, send me an email and I'll attach it to a reply.
hi chaps
Thanks for all you responses.
the car is at tech 9 and i will let you know the feedback from them
they are puttting on more camper so i will let you know.
if they muck it up they will be hearing from my solicitors.
i will not be happy if they much up the handling!
thanks
joe
Joe
Soon after I got the car I had a full wheel alignment, after having a new set of tyres fitted. My independent found that there was too much negative camber on the rear, which had caused the tryes to wear out on the inner edges. Since putting it right, I have done 12000 miles, and the tyres have all worn perfectly evenly. I would be worried that Tech9 are going to put on more negative than is correct, just to make it look better. Having said that, they have had some good feedback on this forum, so would seem to be reputable even if they are a bit expensive.
The correct rear camber for C2's and C4's is -1° 10' +/- 15'. Unless you have a camber gauge it would be difficult to check accurately, but a plumb bob, careful measurement, and some simple trigonometry might give you a good approximation.
Here is the info on the factory wheel offsets
If you comapre the 17" wheel option of the earlier cars (255 rear tyre ET55) to that of MY02 onwards with 18" wheels (265 or 285mm rear with ET65) then it is clear that on the later cars with bigger rear tyres there is a need to move the tyre inboard to avoid rubbing the wheel arch edge).
You don't say what size tyres, but given the 11" rear rim width i'd assume 275mm minimum, in which case i'm now not surprised. Your ET of 52 means the rim is 13mm more outboard than the factory 18" option (and not dissimilar to the 10mm discrepancy you quoted originally).
I'm no expert in geometry, but i'd say you'd need some serious camber to get the tyre edge safely within the arches.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.