15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHI may be buying this C4S
Leading reported evidence
Run cost between them
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
a lot prefer the normally aspirated, and also there is a big disparity in running cost between them.
Leading evidence: 'Run cost between them' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run cost between them' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T105141Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
http://www.911uk.com/car.asp?stockid=95249
2 owners. Dealer tells me it is faultless and drives like new. his offer for my 993 is reasonable.
I can hardly drive the 993 as I end up with back pain. I'm guessing this may have something to do with the pedal off-set. This car may be a bit too "boy racer" look for my age but it seems to be the only one around at the price that suits my budget.
Your comments would be much appreciated.
Thanks.
Migration info. Legacy thread was 80573
Sotgee,
That looks very nice. If I'm not mistaken may have seen this car around North London. Southgate-Palmers Green- Winchmore Hill area?
So guys for the moment it looks like thumbs up. With the exception of Daniel. What is it you don't like about the car Daniel? is it the colour, the Kit? Maybe you think I'm too old for it?
Migration info. Legacy thread was 80590
The "problem" with C4S prices are that they are so close to turbo prices now, all be it with a few years difference in age. Means there is some depreciation still to come but ... as said, they are great looking cars and this one in white with the wheels and aero-kit looks the dog's .
V Nice. Its a buy
IMHO
Migration info. Legacy thread was 80611
dont know Anthony,
a lot prefer the normally aspirated, and also there is a big disparity in running cost between them.
Migration info. Legacy thread was 80615
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
