18 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCarrera logo for aero kit part number. I know I've seen it but search isn't helpful
Leading reported evidence
Use script # 9965592370970c
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I'm using script # 9965592370970c on both my '99 deck lids.
Carrera logo for aero kit part number. I know I've seen it but search isn't helpful
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Use script # 9965592370970c' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace from mk1' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Tom I'm wondering if it isn't separated into two different part #'s because the placement of the badge changed from Mk1 to Mk2?
Carrera logo for aero kit part number. I know I've seen it but search isn't helpful
Run (or potentially the whole
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I suspect that there was likely much variation during the first model year run (or potentially the whole run since there aren't a ton of .1 XAA cars).
Carrera logo for aero kit part number. I know I've seen it but search isn't helpful
Run since there aren't a ton of .1 xaa cars)
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I suspect that there was likely much variation during the first model year run (or potentially the whole run since there aren't a ton of .1 XAA cars).
Carrera logo for aero kit part number. I know I've seen it but search isn't helpful
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
18 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T155324Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
AFAIK, there are two different sizes one for the standard decklid and one for the aero kit. Looking for the aero kit part
Pelican shows these two
https://www.pelicanparts.com/More_In...4311&DID=38824
https://www.pelicanparts.com/More_In...4311&DID=20645
Tom I'm wondering if it isn't separated into two different part #'s because the placement of the badge changed from Mk1 to Mk2? The placement would also be different on an Mk1 with Aero, it would be lower like the Mk2.
I have a 99 Carrera cab in my workshop and my 03 in my home garage I'm happy to take measurements and report back this weekend. Photos below to reference my above comment.
Thanks, I�ve got a few examples to compare but no part numbers. Nor does the part give a size if there was a difference.
funny I never noticed it was lower on the MK2. the aero kit position looks to be in the middle right where the bulge is in the standard deck lid.
The 996.1 Technical Bulletin for Aerokit installation lists 996.559.237.00.70C (latest updated P/N ends in 06 70C) as the script P/N. It also gives measurements for placement: "The bonding height is 50mm from the lower edge".
I'm using script # 9965592370970c on both my '99 deck lids. It's the ~260mm version referenced in this install diagram.
My original script was mounted high and I mounted the one on the spoiler lid in the same place. Maybe I need to move it to the lower location as shown on the lid in the Porsche catalog.
Here�s my 2000. Factory aero car,
as from the factory. All original. Invoice date of
3/1/2000.
But I�m guessing that it really came down to if Hans & Franz were in a hurry to get to the Biergarten.
Well now I�m confused. I have three aero kits and two are both in the same middle position. The third one is missing which is why I�m replacing it.
that example looks too low without the indentation of the standard engine cover.
[Image-only post; no author-written text. Original image references:]
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlist.com-vbulletin/1729x766/capture_5a242c8773610bad680765f7e457a43b432b0b2f.jpg
My 9/98 build XAA is lower than yours but higher what is shown by
@wab_jr
. I suspect that there was likely much variation during the first model year run (or potentially the whole run since there aren't a ton of .1 XAA cars). Similar production variations exist in other P-car models going all the way back to the beginning.
Some 09/98 cars (probably built first four days of that month) may have had amber lenses, which means they would have been assembled (with 993’s) in a different factory than the later 996’s
If your car is amber-lenses that could explain the discrepancy in logo placements (??)
We would please like to know definitively if your car had amber lenses, or at least the last four digits of your VIN? Thanks!!
Hi everyone. Hope this helps:
"IF" you have the division line in the middle.
996.559.237.10 Carrera silver lower
Position logo
Carrera
with the dimensions
A
and
C
Carrera logo dimension 129.6 mm+/−1 mm and
B
Carrera logo dimension 45 mm−1 mm and stick on lid.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
