fullymatted.
Back to search
Planet-9

$620.00 USD Landed Stateside

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
7 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH$620.00 USD Landed Stateside

Leading reported evidence

Repair costs, or they might try

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I don't know about the dealer, I really doubt they'd car, but insurance company could be a different matter if the car is involved in an accident and damaged in the rear they 'could' argue that your modification increased the amount of damage received by removing the sub structure arms and thereby not pay for the full repair costs, or they might try to disclaim altogether depending upon your insurance contract.

Original post Read captured discussion
$620.00 USD Landed Stateside
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Repair costs, or they might try' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Repair costs, or they might try' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 7 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Repair costs, or they might try

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I don't know about the dealer, I really doubt they'd car, but insurance company could be a different matter if the car is involved in an accident and damaged in the rear they 'could' argue that your modification increased the amount of damage received by removing the sub structure arms and thereby not pay for the full repair costs, or they might try to disclaim altogether depending upon your insurance contract.

Original post Read captured discussion
$620.00 USD Landed Stateside
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Planet-9: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T191851Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 2Original post

But remember that you will have to do extensive modification for this to fit (see Articles) And your Dealer and Insurance Co. will not like this either...

POST 3Original post

KaiserSozay, I think what he means is that there are aluminum pieces RIVETED to the main bumper that will have to be cut off or the rivets drilled out, etc. to allow the new bumper to fit. See the Article about removing your bumperettes in our Articles section and you'll see what he means. The proof you seek is in the photos I took. /fckeditor/editor/images/smiley/MWPX/taunt.gif

POST 4Original post

Actually I think you were asking about proof that a dealer or insurance company wouldn't like it. I don't know about the dealer, I really doubt they'd car, but insurance company could be a different matter if the car is involved in an accident and damaged in the rear they 'could' argue that your modification increased the amount of damage received by removing the sub structure arms and thereby not pay for the full repair costs, or they might try to disclaim altogether depending upon your insurance contract. At the very least I'd read over your insurance contract to see if there is anything in it about modifying safety equipment.

POST 5Original post

you know I've always wondered why you guys have those bumperettes because they don't look very aesthetic. I'm sorry you have to put up with those. Mind you we over here in the UK have to have front Number Plates which I guess spoil the front of the car too... The Standard UK number plate is actually bigger than the front number plate mount !!

POST 6Original post

<blockquote id="quote">quote:<hr id="quote" noshade="noshade" height="1" /> you know I've always wondered why you guys have those bumperettes because they don't look very aesthetic. I'm sorry you have to put up with those. Mind you we over here in the UK have to have front Number Plates which I guess spoil the front of the car too... The Standard UK number plate is actually bigger than the front number plate mount !! <hr id="quote" noshade="noshade" height="1" /> If you look at any European car magazine, nearly all of the cars over there have front plates and they don't look too bad to me....perhaps because they are not as tall as ours in the states. I had a Vette prior to my Cayman and becasue the front comes into a point, a front plate looks ridiculous on that car. On the Cayman S?......not so bad. Then again my out of state dealer drilled holes in mine and mounted the bracket.......perhaps I am just 'telling myself' that it doesn't look so bad/fckeditor/editor/images/smiley/MWPX/crazy.gif </blockquote> Edited by - AmerLemans on 03/02/2006 04:57:59 AM

POST 7Original post

Please keep us posted on the bumper - were you planning to do the swap yourself or having the dealer do it for you. If you end up doing it yourself please document it with an article here.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.