20 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHSo I am thinking of getting a 2001 now?
Reported or suspected cause
lot better option than
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
The Ultimate Cupholder is probably a lot better option than using the very high mounted factory cupholders.
Leading evidence: 'lot better option than' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'lot better option than' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Set on getting a 996.2' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I was set on getting a 996.2 for the updated headlights and power update.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I'm a bit frankly puzzled on why Porsche decided to use such a heavy rim for their top performance model but I suspect it had more to do with long term durability and style more than anything else.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The Ultimate Cupholder is probably a lot better option than using the very high mounted factory cupholders.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I'm a bit frankly puzzled on why Porsche decided to use such a heavy rim for their top performance model but I suspect it had more to do with long term durability and style more than anything else.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
20 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T135432Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I was set on getting a 996.2 for the updated headlights and power update. But I found a 2001 Coupe in the color combo (Silver/Red) that I wanted with factory aero kit (Taco Wing) which I like.
I know about the IMS update that should be changed out, the scoring of the rings and misaligned cases, etc
So I am thinking of the following upgrades if I decide to buy:
Simple exhaust update/air filter/Etc to push power to 320HP
Looking for GT3 Rims, the Turbo Twists are not my taste
Modern Navi system with IPhone 6S dock system since it is a coupe
I'm ok with the exterior and interior look as I have driven a couple, would be my first water cooled 911. So tell me your thoughts?
Share some pics if you can. As mentioned, it sounds like a nice color combo. These Porsches don't necessarily have immediate requirements that you mentioned, unless maintenance is not up to date. GL
If you go with that combo, the heavy GT3 rims will cancel out the performance you get with the air filter/exhaust/ecu/etc.
If you're going for performance, do yourself a favor and skip the GT3 rims. I'm a bit frankly puzzled on why Porsche decided to use such a heavy rim for their top performance model but I suspect it had more to do with long term durability and style more than anything else.
I have a 2000 C2, only issue radiator exp. tank, 58k miles, orig. IMS. I tend to think you won't notice the 20 hp except for the dent in your wallet. Upgrade the suspension and sway bars.
Your 320HP number with the mods you listed may be a pipe dream. Depending on which combinations you choose, your HP may be lower than when you started. I have blown a lot of money on strap-on, er, bolt-on mods for my Boxster and then my 996, and I wound up dumping nearly all of them. Right now the engine is bone-stock except for the Fister exhaust - and I love it.
I may be alone here, but a double-DIN head unit doesn't match the simplicity of the 996 interior. I _LIKE_ the dopey orange-letter radio; it's charming. Once you start bolting a bunch of electronics onto a 996, it's becoming something other than a 996.
Taco wings are sad. MK1 GT3 wing = rawr.
All in my opinion - but in my defense, you solicited opinions.
My thought you will never feel 20 hp with any mods. That car is very strong as is plus upgrades to the suspension. Once you learn how to drive it the want for more hp won't matter...than againI have a 4.0 so what do I know.
Show us some pics!
For me the best upgrades (other than the 997 engine, which is #1 by far) are:
- exhaust (a custom exhaust in combination with ECU tune), totally addictive sound!
- sticky tires for track and twisty mountain roads
Future mods:
Suspension upgrade to JRZ coilovers for next track season (currently 030 suspension).
Now have the turbo twists as well. They are not my favourite but they have grown on me; maybe a set of BBS is in the future. Loved the Fikse wheels on my past 986 as well.
Would also love to have the rest of the aerokit (currently just the side skirts)
As for the sound system - my 996 has the Bose upgrade but I prefer the awesome sound of the exhaust.
Also, if you werent aware, the mk 1 cars dont have a glove box (if that matters...it did to me)
Ive driven both, and to me i could tell the power difference, and the mk 2 just felt a little better, although that may have been a function of the cars i was driving vs engineering improvements.
As others have said, dont settle. Find the one you really want to avoid regrets.
I thought having no glove box would be an issue, but have never missed it. Drover a C4S when I was looking, actually felt slower to me....but that's just a feeling.
Don't sweat the glovebox or the cupholders. The map pockets in the doors give you plenty of space to carry junk. The Ultimate Cupholder is probably a lot better option than using the very high mounted factory cupholders. I've had both interiors now, and frankly there's not a lot of difference. Both were full leather, and for a sports car, I thought both were just great.
Also, I never once thought my '99 C4 Aero felt slow. The 296 hp that car possessed were plenty to get me up to illegal speeds faster than I realized on many occasions. It's not a drag-racing car, but you don't want to treat your car like that anyway.
This would be the car thanks for all the feedback about the mods, wheels, etc
The 996.2 looks great with the GT3 Aero kit that they made for that model.
The Taco Wing Aero kit looks great for the 996...period....My Op hence why I am looking to get this car
Buy it, I have a C4S after wrecking my 996.1 with the aero kit. I still wish I had the 996.1 with the taco honestly.
Send a pic of the options sticker.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.