fullymatted.
Back to search
PistonHeads

992.2 Carrera S, or 992.2 GTS? - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
18 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH992.2 Carrera S, or 992.2 GTS? - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK

Leading reported evidence

Test drove it

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I haven't driven the S but l found the GTS to be too fast for the A&B roads l test drove it on.

992.2 Carrera S, or 992.2 GTS? - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Test drove it' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Test drove it' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 18 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Test drove it

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I haven't driven the S but l found the GTS to be too fast for the A&B roads l test drove it on.

992.2 Carrera S, or 992.2 GTS? - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

18 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • PistonHeads: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T155324Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

So this is the dilemma. (First Porsche purchase btw) Today I borrowed a (horribly specced) Carrera S from the dealer, and at first I was very underwhelmed --- it felt a little bit too "normal car". Fast, but not very special. But then putting it into sport / manual etc. I started to "get it" and enjoy it. I figured I could spec it up (sport chrono etc.) to add some drama and it would be where I wanted it to be. But now I'm wondering - would it just make more sense to go with the GTS? (Which I've not driven) I don't care about the speed (the S didn't disappoint on that front), but more the driving experience and engagement. Is this massively different, or not really? (And before you say T, that was my original plan, but the lack of options for it killed it for me, sadly) Basically I'm not super interested in the GTS on paper (more expensive, more complex, dealers seem to be trying to get rid of them), but....... would I feel different if I drove it? Or would a top spec S do the job just as well for like 20k less? Any experience much appreciated!

POST 2Original post

I would have thought speccing an S with all the sporty options will be more satisfying than the GTS if more power is not what you want. I think something like the bucket seats will make a significant difference to the feel of the car. I had a go at it and realised there is no sports suspension available anymore (I thought in the past that was an option - sth like a 10mm drop and stiffer) https://porsche-code.com/PTFCQ4F4 Edit: I have not driven one, so no first hand knowledge

POST 3Original post

never mind, I specced a Carrera instead of a Carrera S - on the S the sports suspension is available. So that is what I would do - sports suspension, bucket seats, lightweight glass (hopefully more sound), sports exhaust, PCCBs for the weight reduction

POST 4Original post

I was in a similar situation. Went off GTS because of this https://www.theautopian.com/here-are-the-insane-ca... Had previously liked the idea of the GTS as no lag due to the hybrid powertrain but the various ownership conditions above put me off Now thinking about an S but as you say it’s fast and capable but having driven one it isn’t necessarily as fast / special as its price suggests

POST 5Original post

The .2 GTS has that low down punch (barely any lag) that's very impressive but the S isn't that much slower if you look at the 0-60 times (need to tick the sport chrono option to close the gap). I haven't driven the S but l found the GTS to be too fast for the A&B roads l test drove it on. I did like the race tex interior and the front end looks better. MDL111 said: I would have thought speccing an S with all the sporty options will be more satisfying than the GTS if more power is not what you want. I think something like the bucket seats will make a significant difference to the feel of the car. I had a go at it and realised there is no sports suspension available anymore (I thought in the past that was an option - sth like a 10mm drop and stiffer) https://porsche-code.com/PTFCQ4F4 Edit: I have not driven one, so no first hand knowledge Shame you can't get those fancy bucket seats in the UK, they are the older iteration where you can't have rear seats. Edited by thesmurfs on Thursday 25th September 21:31

POST 6 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

crystalmethod said: I was in a similar situation. Went off GTS because of this https://www.theautopian.com/here-are-the-insane-ca... Had previously liked the idea of the GTS as no lag due to the hybrid powertrain but the various ownership conditions above put me off Now thinking about an S but as you say it s fast and capable but having driven one it isn t necessarily as fast / special as its price suggests Yeah - I hadn't quite appreciated how much prices had gone up in recent times (because I wasn't looking before). The question is whether resale values will also be proportionally higher in the future... if so it's OK, but that's a pretty big assumption to make! tbf people say the car isn't worth the money, but then compared to what? Not really any competition among new cars.

POST 7Original post

MDL111 said: never mind, I specced a Carrera instead of a Carrera S - on the S the sports suspension is available. So that is what I would do - sports suspension, bucket seats, lightweight glass (hopefully more sound), sports exhaust, PCCBs for the weight reduction I did pretty much that, last year, on one of the last 992.1s. Considered the ‘Base’, the ‘T’, the ‘S’ and the ‘GTS’. At the time, the details of the 992.2 were unclear - only that the GTS would be Hybrid (which I didn’t want) and no Manual (which I did want). Had all manner of 911s in the past - from 2.7RSL to 991.2 GT3 Touring - but wanted more emphasis on comfort and usability, and low weight - it benefits all the dynamic qualities. Ended up with an ‘S’ with Manual, PCCBs, Lwt Glass, PSE and a few other bits including standard suspension and sports seats. Porsche’s own production configurator showed 1437kg (plus fluids). Really happy, rhd but lives in S France, and suits the roads there perfectly. A good friend of mine (who has a 992.1 ‘T’ PDK) and a very well known motoring broadcaster and long term 911 owner, had a 992.2 ‘T’ on loan from Porsche Cars GB last week (for some filming work) and both were smitten by it enough to both be planning to get one - the defining factor being the Manual gearbox.

POST 8Original post

Geneve said: I did pretty much that, last year, on one of the last 992.1s. Considered the Base , the T , the S and the GTS . At the time, the details of the 992.2 were unclear - only that the GTS would be Hybrid (which I didn t want) and no Manual (which I did want). Had all manner of 911s in the past - from 2.7RSL to 991.2 GT3 Touring - but wanted more emphasis on comfort and usability, and low weight - it benefits all the dynamic qualities. Ended up with an S with Manual, PCCBs, Lwt Glass, PSE and a few other bits including standard suspension and sports seats. Porsche s own production configurator showed 1437kg (plus fluids). Really happy, rhd but lives in S France, and suits the roads there perfectly. A good friend of mine (who has a 992.1 T PDK) and a very well known motoring broadcaster and long term 911 owner, had a 992.2 T on loan from Porsche Cars GB last week (for some filming work) and both were smitten by it enough to both be planning to get one - the defining factor being the Manual gearbox. that sounds very nice. I think a manual 911 with all the lightweight and sporty options is still a really nice proposition as a sports car. I do agree with others that they have gotten really expensive though (UK less so than in other markets). For me a 997.2 C2S is still pretty much the perfect daily/only car. I remember driving my friend's car when they were new and thinking, you don't really need more than that and so useable with the rear seats.

POST 9 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Geneve said: I did pretty much that, last year, on one of the last 992.1s. Considered the Base , the T , the S and the GTS . At the time, the details of the 992.2 were unclear - only that the GTS would be Hybrid (which I didn t want) and no Manual (which I did want). Had all manner of 911s in the past - from 2.7RSL to 991.2 GT3 Touring - but wanted more emphasis on comfort and usability, and low weight - it benefits all the dynamic qualities. Ended up with an S with Manual, PCCBs, Lwt Glass, PSE and a few other bits including standard suspension and sports seats. Porsche s own production configurator showed 1437kg (plus fluids). Really happy, rhd but lives in S France, and suits the roads there perfectly. A good friend of mine (who has a 992.1 T PDK) and a very well known motoring broadcaster and long term 911 owner, had a 992.2 T on loan from Porsche Cars GB last week (for some filming work) and both were smitten by it enough to both be planning to get one - the defining factor being the Manual gearbox. Totally...... but I just can't be paying £130k for a car with a black interior. Otherwise, they could have my money now.

POST 10Original post

[quote=crystalmethod...Went off GTS because of this https://www.theautopian.com/here-are-the-insane-ca... ... [/quote] Hmm, interesting article. I think that a lot of 911s are driven very regularly. (I certainly use mine most days). And so hybrid, high voltage battery management is not something that would necessarily be a problem for me most of the time. But the idea that you should not leave the car outside in sub zero temperatures, nor under direct summer sunlight for any length of time... Nor can you trust the car to start again if left at an airport carpark for >2 weeks. Hmmm. On the battery too cold issue, I think the chemistry is that the battery drains more quickly while in standby at sub-zero temperatures. And on the battery too warm issue, I think that causes the battery to age faster. Both 296 and Artura have depreciated quite heavily, despite being - by all accounts - really entertaining cars to drive. It will be interesting to see if Porsche's hybrids are also a harder sell into the preowned market. I certainly can't stand the faff of turning off all the ADAS on 2025 cars. Have you considered finding a 992.1 T, S or GTS that ticks all your boxes?

POST 11Original post

how about a 992.1 turbo s with lightweight package which is essentially what a 't' is anyway that's what I'd personally be considering if I was you (not sure how easy it is to find one though!)

POST 12 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

WCZ said: how about a 992.1 turbo s with lightweight package which is essentially what a 't' is anyway that's what I'd personally be considering if I was you (not sure how easy it is to find one though!) was very tempted by the 50th anniversary one, but they're 200k+!

POST 13 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

WCZ said: how about a 992.1 turbo s with lightweight package which is essentially what a 't' is anyway that's what I'd personally be considering if I was you (not sure how easy it is to find one though!) was very tempted by the 50th anniversary one, but they're 200k+!

POST 14Original post

That battery stuff is scare-mongering. Most of that is merely 'recommended' as batteries work in all temperatures otherwise EVs could not exist. Norway is almost entirely EVs and it gets really cold there. The only real piece of information in there is in the event you are planning on not using a GTS for several weeks, then make sure it has a nearly full charge before leaving it.

POST 15Original post

The ride quality of the GTS killed it for me - at least on the roads here in Glos. It's just a bit firm for me (and I am ex 996.2 GT3 owner so happier than most with firm cars).

POST 16Original post

Hi, I am having same dilemma, 992.2 4s or 992.2 4 GTS. Ideally an ICE Turbo 992.2 (If they launch one) or a 992.1 turbo s (right one at right price and would rather really have a new car) We had battery issues after 4 years on our 992.1 S, kept for 5th year and sold on. Now missing a 911 like crazy, so looking at Jan-Apr to sort! I have a deposit with OPC for a turbo (not s), they say it will come, but I am not sure about hybrid for all those reasons and maybe deprecation - praying for 600bhp ICE 992.2 GT3 Touring with back seats would be perfect but there is more chance of me getting to the moon!!!

POST 17 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Simon-Blue said: Hi, I am having same dilemma, 992.2 4s or 992.2 4 GTS. Ideally an ICE Turbo 992.2 (If they launch one) or a 992.1 turbo s (right one at right price and would rather really have a new car) We had battery issues after 4 years on our 992.1 S, kept for 5th year and sold on. Now missing a 911 like crazy, so looking at Jan-Apr to sort! I have a deposit with OPC for a turbo (not s), they say it will come, but I am not sure about hybrid for all those reasons and maybe deprecation - praying for 600bhp ICE 992.2 GT3 Touring with back seats would be perfect but there is more chance of me getting to the moon!!! If we were "sensible" we would wait 18 months, and there will be 992.2 GT3s with back seats available and trading for around 170k..... but sadly that kind of patience is humanly impossible!

POST 18Original post

gen 2 S in Fjord Green. What a stunner https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-details/202511107...

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.