fullymatted.
Back to search
911uk

Foxwell scanner question

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
9 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHFoxwell scanner question

Leading reported evidence

Check nt530 and i couldn't see anything obvious

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I've just checked my NT530 and I couldn't see anything obvious for coding out the spoiler.

Original post Read captured discussion
Foxwell scanner question
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Check nt530 and i couldn't see anything obvious' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check nt530 and i couldn't see anything obvious' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 9 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Check nt530 and i couldn't see anything obvious

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I've just checked my NT530 and I couldn't see anything obvious for coding out the spoiler.

Original post Read captured discussion
Foxwell scanner question
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • 911uk: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T044418Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Does anyone know if the nt510 will code out the active rear wing? I read the nt530 will and went to buy one but only seem to see nt510 for Porsche on flea bay. If the 510 will ill just buy that. Thanks for any help.

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 2723188

Thank you

POST 4Original post

no idea about the NT510 but Foxwell NT530 Plus Professional Multi-System Scan Tool for Porsche Vehicles Foxwell NT530 Plus Professional Multi-System Scan Tool for Porsche Vehicles - only £164.00 including VAT & UK delivery! www.gendan.co.uk Alternatively the company above are the main importers of Foxwell.

POST 5Original post

I've just checked my NT530 and I couldn't see anything obvious for coding out the spoiler.

POST 6 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Thanks for the replies. I think coding out the spoiler is there in the nt530 it's not obvious though. Someone also said they could not do it and a guy showed how to do it. I screenshottef it so I could find it myself. I emailed Gendan and they said buy a durametric. Not very useful as I have other cars ill need to use it on.

POST 7Original post

Quotes source post: 2723617

Sorry I should have been clearer, I was advising the NT530 in terms of being newer not that it code do spolier coding. Sorry my mistake.

POST 8 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Well, for anyone this might help. My 996.2 does NOT allow special functions and to be able to code stuff. I'm not saying it's the same for all 996's but mine does not. If I manually input it's a 997 it gives the option of coding through special functions but won't go any further on my 996, So that was a waste of money lol.

POST 9 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Oh I bought the Nt530 plus by the way.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.