10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCreeky 911
Leading reported evidence
Adjust by moving the top strut mount in the slots
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Camber is adjusted by moving the top strut mount in the slots, so you would definitely need to check it after changing a strut.
Leading evidence: 'Adjust by moving the top strut mount in the slots' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'suspension issue' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Adjust by moving the top strut mount in the slots' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause · Original poster
I suspect a suspension issue on a joint or something but it has only just started and is only noticable at very slow speed.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Camber is adjusted by moving the top strut mount in the slots, so you would definitely need to check it after changing a strut.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T183130Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Anyone tell me what the probable cause of a creek I hear coming from the front offside wheel area. I suspect a suspension issue on a joint or something but it has only just started and is only noticable at very slow speed.
Next question I suppose I will be asking, once I know what is causing it, is will it be covered under the warranty?
had the same horrid noise will only get worse, it is the front wishbone and your opc will charge £250.00 to do it had one side done and the next went in 3 months, not covered under warranty, good old warranty.
Phil
typical, and it seams that it is very common in fact my OPC had a job to get the part as it was on back order, in the end they got it from another dealer, glad as it was so noisey, people often looking and feeling pleased that you were driving a knackered sounding Porsche, little do they know.
Apparently Porsche classify it as a "fast moving stock item". Just to give an idea of how common this is take a look at this item on eBay, and note the number available:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWA%3AIT&viewitem=&item=8065637431&rd=1,1
If any suspension component is changed, minor differences in geometry do result and caster, camber, toe and KPI all need to be checked and adjusted. It is also imperative that all the front wheel adjustments are done relative to both a datum that bisects the car front to rear and to the prior alignment of the rear wheels. My independent had to invest in £15000 of computer-controlled, 4-wheel, laser alignment equipment for doing this so it's not really a DIY job!
I don't dispute that geometry is important, but this particular part is fairly precisely made. The points at which it is attached are non-adjustable, so the geometry shouldn't be affected badly. I think you'll find that the book time for the job is about an hour, and the total cost from an OPC is about £250 (independent around £175) so they won't do a geometry check afterwards - or maybe just a quick toe and camber check.
It can be a bit of a pig to split the ball joint, but other than that it is relatively straightforward.
Take your point about the item being 'non-adjustable'
It could be interesting to get before and after geometry checks done on cars where various different suspension components have been replaced. This could be included in the technical articles section to give owners a guideline on when realignment is or isn't required / recommended.
On the front axle of standard 996's there is only adjustment for camber and toe - nothing else. Therefore it is a relatively quick job to check them after any suspension component change. Camber is adjusted by moving the top strut mount in the slots, so you would definitely need to check it after changing a strut.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.