fullymatted.
Back to search
PistonHeads

Awful unnoficial porsche websites - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
4 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHAwful unnoficial porsche websites - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Leading reported evidence

Use porsche name, porsche don't seem toobotrhered

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

apart from stringing specialists up for using the porsche name, porsche don't seem toobotrhered with web technology.

Original post Read captured discussion
Awful unnoficial porsche websites - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use porsche name, porsche don't seem toobotrhered' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use porsche name, porsche don't seem toobotrhered' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 4 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Use porsche name, porsche don't seem toobotrhered

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

apart from stringing specialists up for using the porsche name, porsche don't seem toobotrhered with web technology.

Original post Read captured discussion
Awful unnoficial porsche websites - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

4 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • PistonHeads: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T135432Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 2 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Porsche need to send out the style police to hunt them down, even if they arn't official. Maybe we could set up a charity to give these visually impaired amateurs some design consultation.

POST 3Original post

some hope... apart from stringing specialists up for using the porsche name, porsche don't seem toobotrhered with web technology. the porsche website isn't exactly state of the art & whoever "maintains" the motorsport section obviously only works in december!! but then if you produce such a great car i guess you don't have to bother too much about the web...

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I've now searched through all the Porsche related websites I can find, looking at dealers, motorsport specialists and tuners out of interest. The only decent sites out of the 100's searched are the official Porsche site, RUF, Paragon and JZMachtech. All the others look like some awful kids homework project. The type layout, quality of photo's, messy and unlogical navigation are abysmal. Some that try a little harder fail in their over complex approach and general takiness - hello - it's the 21st century, not 1980. These site's are a disgrace to the marque. Sort it out. You must be loosing loads of potential custom.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.