11 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHthoughts on this TT please?!
Leading reported evidence
Check gearbox - they list it as a tip
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
thanks guys - i checked the gearbox - they list it as a tip but pic is a manual.
Leading evidence: 'Check gearbox - they list it as a tip' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check gearbox - they list it as a tip' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
- checked on AA website and they dont list porsches under their dekra inspections.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
HPI etc of course - what about checking for prev accidents etc?
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
As it's had one owner, just check the service history (it should be good).
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
must say that didnt fill me with purchasing enthusiasm - think there are better ones out there at £42k, let alone £45k
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T165639Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi guys,
taking a look at this car tomorrow - any thoughts comments?
http://www.imperials.co.uk/detail?template=/imperials06/hitlistdetail&vid=12153093&make=31&dealer=15392&pn=11&orderby=price_asc&lang=en&country2=GB&vids=12051152,12204079,12096936,12059601,12059610,11956155,12153093,11901757,11859413&vidindex=6
ALL welcome, good, and especially bad.
My 1st thoughts
-miles too high?
-2000 not a good year?
-too high priced? (this can be rectified i'm sure!)
-sat nav aftermarket? - good or bad?
many thanks
Migration info. Legacy thread was 108694
It is over six years old. Even at book miles (6K per year it would have upto 42K on the clock. So 54K is not too bad at all.
As it's had one owner, just check the service history (it should be good). Aftermarket sat nav is probably better than the original PCM. So no worries there either.
On the surface sounds alright to me. Better at £42K though! :wink:
Migration info. Legacy thread was 108699
Nice looking car, mileage not an issue.
Perhaps price a little on the high side. Also its a Tiptronic, which IMHO makes it less desirable.
Migration info. Legacy thread was 108700
thanks guys - i checked the gearbox - they list it as a tip but pic is a manual. It is indeed a manual. No autos for me thanks very much ;o)
Not sure whether i'd be able to bump them 3-4k unless i take it 'trade'.
What type of checks can i do? - checked on AA website and they dont list porsches under their dekra inspections.
HPI etc of course - what about checking for prev accidents etc?
cheers
Migration info. Legacy thread was 108703
I think it is about 3k over what it should be. The satnav looks like the becker like one that I had in my car when i first bought it - its just turn indications and no maps.
Seats look like they are NOT sports but it says that they are.
I would not take their warranty but get them to put it through the Porsche warranty check and then buy the warranty yourself for i think, now, 895 (was a bargain at 725!)
Black is a ***** to keep clean...
Migration info. Legacy thread was 108923
the girl from the dealership just brought it round - drove it and it drives nice- need some paint here and there for scratches, and a couple of kerb marks on the front wheel.
history is all same porsche dealer as is 1 owner car.
However, when the girl left i looked at the car from my house window only to see her accelerate away at full pace and hit a speed bump like it wasnt there.
must say that didnt fill me with purchasing enthusiasm - think there are better ones out there at £42k, let alone £45k
cheers
Migration info. Legacy thread was 108928
Hi,
Being the type of bloke I am which is very much a stickler for detail. Not one for incorrect info on the spec.
Ought to have stated Becker Sat Nav .
Ought to have stated manual.
Could be wrong but sport seats will not have the heated option, mine don't in my C4S.
Sloppy advert indicates poor focus on quality. With the fact the "Girl" driver :wink:
did not respect the speed bump supports more poor input from the firm.
Spent 12 months sourcing my beast walked from many. Would not touch this for reasons given and needs circa £5000 off the price.
Enjoy the journey. With interest rates going up there may well be some good deals to be had as second hand residuals take a hammering
Alan.
Migration info. Legacy thread was 108947
£42 Tops imho
Its worth about £36 in the trade
The cars out there in the low £50's are a far better than that for £6/7K more, you ought to get a car done circa 30k miles,
Allwys have an OPC check
Remember the cost of brakes and spark plug changes with Turbos,
£1800 brakes £550 to change the plugs
And it sounds like they're giving the old
' wouldn't you rather see an original car with stone chips rather than a car where they've been covered up'
i sentence that saves them £750 to paint the front end
Migration info. Legacy thread was 109074
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
