fullymatted.
Back to search
PistonHeads

First Boxster 3.2 S, first 72 miles where good! - Page 2 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
29 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHFirst Boxster 3.2 S, first 72 miles where good! - Page 2 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Leading reported evidence

Inspect properly today, and it's not good

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

The car was inspected properly today, and it's not good.

First Boxster 3.2 S, first 72 miles where good! - Page 2 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

The car was inspected properly today, and it's not good.

First Boxster 3.2 S, first 72 miles where good! - Page 2 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

The car was inspected properly today, and it's not good.

First Boxster 3.2 S, first 72 miles where good! - Page 2 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Frequently discussed work

Inspect car

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Upon inspecting the car, it would appear that the ns drive shaft has come loose at the gearbox flange, and then the Shaft has flailed around, destroying the UJ, but hopefully only scuffing any thing else.

First Boxster 3.2 S, first 72 miles where good! - Page 2 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Inspect properly today, and it's not good' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Inspect car' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 29 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Compare 4 other evidence results

Replace cv boots about 2000 miles previous

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

Last owner changed the cv boots about 2000 miles previous.

First Boxster 3.2 S, first 72 miles where good! - Page 2 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Replace driveshaft rubber gaiters

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Has someone changed the driveshaft rubber gaiters and then forgot to tighten the bolts?

First Boxster 3.2 S, first 72 miles where good! - Page 2 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Suggestion

Has someone changed the driveshaft rubber gaiters and then forgot to tighten the bolts?

First Boxster 3.2 S, first 72 miles where good! - Page 2 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

Has someone changed the driveshaft rubber gaiters and then forgot to

First Boxster 3.2 S, first 72 miles where good! - Page 2 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Tighten correctly

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

The reason for the failure, was the bolts not being tightened correctly.

First Boxster 3.2 S, first 72 miles where good! - Page 2 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Inspect car

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Upon inspecting the car, it would appear that the ns drive shaft has come loose at the gearbox flange, and then the Shaft has flailed around, destroying the UJ, but hopefully only scuffing any thing else.

First Boxster 3.2 S, first 72 miles where good! - Page 2 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Frequently discussed actions (10)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Inspect car

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Upon inspecting the car, it would appear that the ns drive shaft has come loose at the gearbox flange, and then the Shaft has flailed around, destroying the UJ, but hopefully only scuffing any thing else.

First Boxster 3.2 S, first 72 miles where good! - Page 2 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Inspect properly today, and it's not good

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

The car was inspected properly today, and it's not good.

First Boxster 3.2 S, first 72 miles where good! - Page 2 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

The car was inspected properly today, and it's not good.

First Boxster 3.2 S, first 72 miles where good! - Page 2 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

The car was inspected properly today, and it's not good.

First Boxster 3.2 S, first 72 miles where good! - Page 2 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Recommend autostrasse in coggeshall if you are in essex

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Can personally recommend Autostrasse in Coggeshall if you are in Essex, but it does sound expensive for parts!!

First Boxster 3.2 S, first 72 miles where good! - Page 2 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Repair cost

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

So no legal come back, just hoping he's a good guy and helps with the repair cost.

First Boxster 3.2 S, first 72 miles where good! - Page 2 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Repair will require replacement gearbox, driveshaft, possibly exhaust header, tray

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

To repair will require replacement gearbox, driveshaft, possibly exhaust header, tray under gearbox.

First Boxster 3.2 S, first 72 miles where good! - Page 2 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Suggestion

To repair will require replacement gearbox, driveshaft, possibly exhaust header, tray under gearbox.

First Boxster 3.2 S, first 72 miles where good! - Page 2 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Suggestion

To repair will require replacement gearbox, driveshaft, possibly exhaust header, tray under gearbox.

First Boxster 3.2 S, first 72 miles where good! - Page 2 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Replace cv boots about 2000 miles previous

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

Last owner changed the cv boots about 2000 miles previous.

First Boxster 3.2 S, first 72 miles where good! - Page 2 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Replace driveshaft rubber gaiters

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Has someone changed the driveshaft rubber gaiters and then forgot to tighten the bolts?

First Boxster 3.2 S, first 72 miles where good! - Page 2 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Suggestion

Has someone changed the driveshaft rubber gaiters and then forgot to tighten the bolts?

First Boxster 3.2 S, first 72 miles where good! - Page 2 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

Has someone changed the driveshaft rubber gaiters and then forgot to

First Boxster 3.2 S, first 72 miles where good! - Page 2 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Replace not everyone knows

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Possibly not, they could have been torqued up but they are stretch bolts which should be replaced, not everyone knows that.

First Boxster 3.2 S, first 72 miles where good! - Page 2 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Suggestion

Possibly not, they could have been torqued up but they are stretch bolts which should be replaced, not everyone knows that.

First Boxster 3.2 S, first 72 miles where good! - Page 2 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Suggestion

Possibly not, they could have been torqued up but they are stretch bolts which should be replaced, not everyone knows that.

First Boxster 3.2 S, first 72 miles where good! - Page 2 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Replace whilst the gearbox was out

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

From first estimates the bill would have been £3-4k, plus I would have wanted the rms, ims and clutch changed whilst the gearbox was out.

First Boxster 3.2 S, first 72 miles where good! - Page 2 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Set off

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Seemed to be a lovely car, so agreed to buy, set off for the 140 mile journey home, then after just 72 miles of driving at 60-70 on dual carriage way there was an almighty banging and crashing and the car lost drive and we coasted to a halt in the inside lane of the A14.

First Boxster 3.2 S, first 72 miles where good! - Page 2 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

29 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • PistonHeads: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Outcome without a verified action link

t happens, just smile and get it fixed.

No unique explicit quoted action; no causal link assigned

Generation: 20261027T154520Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Hi, after some time Researching and looking, I picked up my first boxster yesterday. A lovely all black 2004 3.2 S, with gt3 wheels, with 47k miles. Seemed to be a lovely car, so agreed to buy, set off for the 140 mile journey home, then after just 72 miles of driving at 60-70 on dual carriage way there was an almighty banging and crashing and the car lost drive and we coasted to a halt in the inside lane of the A14. The AA were great in recovering us off the A14 and dropping us at nearest services. Upon inspecting the car, it would appear that the ns drive shaft has come loose at the gearbox flange, and then the Shaft has flailed around, destroying the UJ, but hopefully only scuffing any thing else. AA then recovered us back to my local garage, who kindly opened up at 8.0pm on a sat evening to get the car inside. Now we wait for a detailed inspection to see what damage has been done. Not quite the welcome to Porsche ownership I had hoped for. I'm sure the wife will start talking to me again eventually!

POST 2Original post

Not the type of introduction to pork you really wanted. Hope you get it sorted out without too much drama.

POST 3Original post

Has someone changed the driveshaft rubber gaiters and then forgot to tighten the bolts?

POST 5Original post

ianwayne said: Has someone changed the driveshaft rubber gaiters and then forgot to tighten renew the bolts? EFA Quite common on 944s, they don't like being reused.

POST 6 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

ianwayne said: Has someone changed the driveshaft rubber gaiters and then forgot to tighten the bolts? Yes, think that's what's happened. Last owner changed the cv boots about 2000 miles previous.

POST 7 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

andymc said: Where did you buy it? Bought privately from Newark-onTrent. So no legal come back, just hoping he's a good guy and helps with the repair cost.

POST 8Original post

Sometimes s t happens, just smile and get it fixed. I am sure I am not alone in thinking this was going to be MUCH worse! On those terms, chalk it up as a win!

POST 9Original post

Thought you were going to say the engine had let go! Sounds like you'll be back on the road again soon, luckily.

POST 10 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Well this isn't going to turn out well. The car was inspected properly today, and it's not good. The driveshaft has smashed the gearbox housing in 3 - 4 places. It has also broken off the boss that the exhaust bracket connects to. Plus the exhaust headers have been bent, and the exhaust is now slightly twisted. To repair will require replacement gearbox, driveshaft, possibly exhaust header, tray under gearbox. I will be looking to get a few quote from local Porsche specialists over the next few days. So if anyone can recommend one in the Essex area that would be good..

POST 11Original post

Neil - YVM said: Well this isn't going to turn out well. The car was inspected properly today, and it's not good. The driveshaft has smashed the gearbox housing in 3 - 4 places. It has also broken off the boss that the exhaust bracket connects to. Plus the exhaust headers have been bent, and the exhaust is now slightly twisted. To repair will require replacement gearbox, driveshaft, possibly exhaust header, tray under gearbox. I will be looking to get a few quote from local Porsche specialists over the next few days. So if anyone can recommend one in the Essex area that would be good.. I am sure that you realise that you are talking some serious costs there. You may want to go down the second hand parts route, maybe even a donor car. Good luck!

POST 12Original post

Thought there would be additional damage, with the damn shaft flailing around like that. Can personally recommend Autostrasse in Coggeshall if you are in Essex, but it does sound expensive for parts!!

POST 13Original post

Neil - YVM said: Well this isn't going to turn out well. The car was inspected properly today, and it's not good. The driveshaft has smashed the gearbox housing in 3 - 4 places. It has also broken off the boss that the exhaust bracket connects to. Plus the exhaust headers have been bent, and the exhaust is now slightly twisted. To repair will require replacement gearbox, driveshaft, possibly exhaust header, tray under gearbox. I will be looking to get a few quote from local Porsche specialists over the next few days. So if anyone can recommend one in the Essex area that would be good.. Bloody hell, what incredible bad luck Hope you get it sorted soon

POST 14 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Ok, for me there is a satisfactory conclusion to this, after some frank discussions with the previous owner, he has agreed to take the car back and refund my money in full. And today I have spent the day trailer it back up to him. I'm still disappointed, as I thought I has bought a great car. But for me it's the best possible outcome, yes I'm a few hundred quid out of pocket, but now I can look for something else.

POST 15Original post

Wow, that is an excellent result and not one you would have bet on. Good on the seller for being decent. Bert

POST 17Original post

The seller must be a top man. Better luck next time around.

POST 18 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Indeed the seller did not need to do this from a contract of sale point of view. I know in this respect I didn't have a leg to stand on. There where no threats on my part, just appealed to his better nature. The reason for the failure, was the bolts not being tightened correctly. Therefore his workmanship or lack of caused the problem. I had taken leagal advice, and although there was no recourse via the contract of sale, there was the possibility to pursue a claim for negligence on his part, especially as he repairs helicopters for a living. But it must be said, that after a long discussion going through the options, the seller called me, and offered to take it back. So although a pain for him, he is a top guy, with a good moral compass.

POST 19Original post

He left the bolts loose and he repairs helicopters for a living! Thats a bit concerning.

POST 20Original post

mollytherocker said: He left the bolts loose and he repairs helicopters for a living! Thats a bit concerning. Possibly not, they could have been torqued up but they are stretch bolts which should be replaced, not everyone knows that. At the very least they should be Loctited. Very good result though.

POST 21Original post

tr7v8 said: mollytherocker said: He left the bolts loose and he repairs helicopters for a living! Thats a bit concerning. Possibly not, they could have been torqued up but they are stretch bolts which should be replaced, not everyone knows that. At the very least they should be Loctited. Very good result though. Sorry, are we talking about the 991 GT3?

POST 22Original post

mollytherocker said: tr7v8 said: mollytherocker said: He left the bolts loose and he repairs helicopters for a living! Thats a bit concerning. Possibly not, they could have been torqued up but they are stretch bolts which should be replaced, not everyone knows that. At the very least they should be Loctited. Very good result though. Sorry, are we talking about the 991 GT3? Quite possibly, similar assembly skills by the look of it

POST 23Original post

Result Neil. Sorry initial Porsche ownership was a hassle, at least all sorted now. Back to the classifieds

POST 24Original post

mollytherocker said: He left the bolts loose and he repairs helicopters for a living! Thats a bit concerning. I hope he doesn't maintain the chopper that I fly - where does he work?

POST 25Original post

I'd be buying the fella a case of wine!! what would the bill have been? £4kish, would an inspection have highlighted this?

POST 26Original post

andymc said: I'd be buying the fella a case of wine!! what would the bill have been? £4kish, would an inspection have highlighted this? So would I. He as acted with honour and integrity, sadly lacking in our world today. Well done that man!

POST 27 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

andymc said: I'd be buying the fella a case of wine!! what would the bill have been? £4kish, would an inspection have highlighted this? From first estimates the bill would have been £3-4k, plus I would have wanted the rms, ims and clutch changed whilst the gearbox was out. The car went through an mot approx 50 miles before I bought it, so unless the bolts where loose, rather than inadiquantly torqued, then I doubt an inspection would have found anything amiss. No inspection or MOT checks that all the nuts are correctly torqued. And yes a 'thank you' has been sent.

POST 29Original post

mollytherocker said: andymc said: I'd be buying the fella a case of wine!! what would the bill have been? £4kish, would an inspection have highlighted this? So would I. He as acted with honour and integrity, sadly lacking in our world today. Well done that man! Indeed. Not a lot of it about these days. Restores a little bit of faith in humanity!

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.