13 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHHike in extended warranty
Leading reported evidence
Use aberdeen opc were not
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I think people using Aberdeen OPC were not that happy at being stiffed for London rates though
Leading evidence: 'Use aberdeen opc were not' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use aberdeen opc were not' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T161109Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I just got a reminder that my extended warranty is due next month, which I already knew, but what I didn't know was that the price has jumped from £740 to £895pa and I bet the expansion tank is still not covered?
Its now starting to move out of the "acceptable" cost range when you consider all the exclusions. Problem is I bet as soon as I don't have it.....!!!!!!
RB
I bought mine the day before they hiked the price [8|] She's an '04 GT3 with just 7,000 miles on and I'm thinking, shall I
bother
to renew it later this year at £900 nearly? [:-]
You're right - it's the "......what if....?" that makes me think I should - then again I could throw caution to the wind, not renew it and modify her to my heart's content [
]
Decisions, decisions......
Philip
Surely £900 for a warrantee on an 04 GT3 is very good value as a percentage of the car and as a percentage of the cost of a replacement engine should it go pop.
Today, I've purchased one for a 996 C2 and, of course, it is the same price - but it gives me peace of mind.
Hi,
Did not know that the standard OPC rate did not include VAT ... also I get a discount on OPC labour at Cambridge due to the age of the car [
] so I havn't paid the official going rate before, apart from in Holland, where it was roughly £75 per hr.
Pete
Blimmey! Is it
really
£110 per/hr labour at OPCs? That's incredible! That's
£2.17 a minute
or (almost)
4 pence a second !!!
(inc VAT) I'm in the wrong job!! I wonder how that compares to you're average BMW/Audi/Merc/VW? Does this mean that the mechanics will get paid more for working there too - as opposed to BMW, etc?
Now, where's that old Readers Digest "Become Your Own Mechanic" manual I used to chock my wheels with....?
Porsche fairly recently standardised the labour rates at £110 per hr for all OPC's
This was not so bad in London and the South East, as I think you will find this is comparable to other premium brands hourly rates (although I did not realise it was exclusive of VAT [
])
I think people using Aberdeen OPC were not that happy at being stiffed for London rates though
Pete
I had a look at one of my invoices and i got charged £78.75 + Vat that included a 25% discount as my car is over 5 years old the same as Pete (burrow) paid which is not far off what i pay on my Clio run about, can not compare the service level, and never lend me a nice loan car foc. Don't think it is to bad?
Phil
I don't think that's correct about the labour rate being standard, UK wide.
I know Aberdeen OPC commented that we (the owners) will pay more for the servicing under the fixed menu pricing...but I was still under the impression that the normal hourly rate was as it was.
£90ish per hour rings a bell...
Might have got it wrong though...
Glen
I'm pretty sure I remember it being announce, I'll see if I can find some confirmation
Other option is here:- might be a long way from Scotland though[
]
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4153/is_20050628/ai_n14692775
Pete
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.