12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH996 C4 help
Leading reported evidence
Use excuse
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
It has been there for a while, they used the excuse that a director has been using it , but only done 2k since major OPC service last May, so can't say I believed them.
Leading evidence: 'Use excuse' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use excuse' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Use excuse
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
It has been there for a while, they used the excuse that a director has been using it , but only done 2k since major OPC service last May, so can't say I believed them.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T044418Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hello everyone, I am looking to buy my first Porsche and have seen the following:-
996 C4 Black, ruffled savannah, 47K, 2000. It's on Autotrader in Manchester.
Priced at £28K, what do you think?
Migration info. Legacy thread was 122895
The price looks about right - though obviously plenty of other things to consider - warranty - service history - condition - owners - options etc etc.
Savannah leather is one of the least desired colours so bear that in mind for resale.
Migration info. Legacy thread was 122896
I'm looking to keep it for 5 years as a weekend car so want the car for me, not the car to be able to sell later. No warranty as far as I know, good condition but would get Peter Morgan to have a look, 2 owners, PCM1. Drives better than a C2 (Blue/Savannah) at 911 Virgin I tried 4 weeks ago.
Migration info. Legacy thread was 122897
If it checks out and you're happy then that's all that matters. I'm looking for a similar car - though not with that colour leather. Is it manual?
Migration info. Legacy thread was 122905
That makes it £29K once a warranty on it, which is a bit expensive IMO. Try and get the OPC warranty included in the price.
Migration info. Legacy thread was 122916
Yes, it is a manual, tried a tip but thought there was too much going on out of my control to really enjoy it. As a daily drive in town I might be convinced otherwise, but for a weekend toy it has to be a manual for me. Got the link if you want to have a look ...
http://dealerservices.autotrader.co.uk/27835/harrison.htm
It has been there for a while, they used the excuse that a director has been using it , but only done 2k since major OPC service last May, so can't say I believed them. So, I think there might be some room for negotiation.
Migration info. Legacy thread was 122927
Might be interested in this instead. As the leather is not savannah, stats007 might also be looking.
http://pistonheads.co.uk/sales/138317.htm
Although slightlyworried it might have been thrashed by a previous owner !
Migration info. Legacy thread was 122956
