fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Alignment

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
8 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHAlignment

Leading reported evidence

Use .2 or -.5 as shown

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

Do I use the .2 or -.5 as shown?

Original post Read captured discussion
Alignment
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use .2 or -.5 as shown' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use .2 or -.5 as shown' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 8 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Use these specs

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

Can I use these specs?

Original post Read captured discussion
Alignment
Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Use .2 or -.5 as shown

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

Do I use the .2 or -.5 as shown?

Original post Read captured discussion
Alignment

Use these specs

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

Can I use these specs?

Original post Read captured discussion
Alignment
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

8 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T074343Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

My 02 4s is getting lowered next week by my mechanic. Not my Porsche indie but my other mechanic. Fixes all my other cars, always super busy and been there for 20 years or so. My indie won�t do work since I already have the parts. No biggie. Anyhow he asked me to get the alignment specs. Can I use these specs? These are what my indie did when he aligned it last year. Commented this is the right set up for this car. Now that I am lowering an inch, still applicable? Also I noticed the front cambers are not within specification. They were previously .2 degree which was within spec. Do I use the .2 or -.5 as shown? Also does he need to get the tire pressures the same as shown? Also, I bought adj toe link so no issue in rear adjusting. Thanks.

POST 2Original post

That looks like a super solid street alignment. Probably max the front camber(-1.5ish) and zero toe in the front. The rear looks great. Enjoy Shawn

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Thank you Shaun. Looking forward to getting this done. Cracked spoiler lips, broken under panels here I come.

POST 5Original post

This is very close to my numbers, and I am very happy. Too much front camber and the car tramlines.

POST 6 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Car is finally done. Thanks all for the help. What a difference.

POST 7Original post

I have an 04 996 2 wheel drive and my numbers are front zero camber and rear -1.0 camber. I lowered the car about 1 - 1 1/2 inch and the best adjustments I could get are front -0.8 and rear -1.9 Are these numbers OK or do I need to make some changes?

POST 8Original post

Those are fine. Keep an eye on your rear tire wear, if the inside edge starts to wear too much you may want to look at correcting it.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.