12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHboring insurance question
Reported repair
Repair value, good policy etc
Reported resolution
1
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report a fix
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Repair value, good policy etc' (1 discussions report resolution; 0 report an unsuccessful attempt). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Repair value, good policy etc' (1 discussions). For that action, 1 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. The most frequently reported fix is 'Repair value, good policy etc', supported by resolution reports in 1 discussions. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I use Adrian Flux- they are v cheap, but the admin leaves something to be desired.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Strongly recommend A Manning in Henley on Thames, they offer a Porsche Friendly scheme.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T212127Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Well, its been some time since I owned my old supersport. Having that go into a wall scared me to death. But, now Im 40 ( scary ) I have realised I should get another porker now, otherwise I never will. So, no more rambling ..
I used to have a list of about 3 good ( read cheap )
insurance
brokers for 911s. But, I can only remember Peart right nw.
Does anyone have a list of good brokers/companies they can tell me ;o)
Thanks very much.
BTW - this one will be a C4 with every driver aid I can think of and ... as many have said in here .. PSE if I can find it ;o) So - no more walls for me !
I recently got mine with Assett Trust (01285 841 555) as it's a weekend only car they did it as a 'future classic' with limited mileage and a great price.
You might also be surprised by trying some of the mainstream internet companies such as Tesco, Elephant. Read the T's & C's but they do offer some great deals.
Thats what I thought when I moved on from my old SC ... reversed the new car into the wall of my daughter's ballet school
As Rob said re
insurance
. Give everyone a chance to quote, you can get some suprising deals.
I've been with Performance Marque for a couple of years. There have been slighty cheaper quotes, but PM have given me consistantly excellent service/advice. Thats not to be underestimated.
Another vote for A Manning. They also allow track day cover with no extra penalties for no extra charge. However you may need 2 years experience with a +200hp RWD car before they offer cover.
Just insured mine with Hagerty at Silverstone. Blew the socks off the quote's from Manning, Heritage et al.
Fixed value, good policy etc. Worth a google or a call.
