19 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHPorsche Engine Replacement - How much of price Premium?
Leading reported evidence
Replace "like
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
The general consensus is that the M96 engine can score its bores at pretty much any point in its working life therefore I wouldn't pay any premium for a car that has had it's engine replaced "like for like".
Porsche Engine Replacement - How much of price Premium?
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Replace "like' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace "like' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
In this instance however the car's engine has already blown, so we're replacing probability with fact.
Porsche Engine Replacement - How much of price Premium?
Frequently discussed actions (2)
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Replace "like
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
The general consensus is that the M96 engine can score its bores at pretty much any point in its working life therefore I wouldn't pay any premium for a car that has had it's engine replaced "like for like".
Porsche Engine Replacement - How much of price Premium?
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
19 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T152433Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Simple question really..
For the 3.6 cars...how much of a premium would you expect to pay (if anything) for a car with a replacement engine from Porsche?
I side by side comparison with a similar age and spec car, OPC history with the original engine at say 80k.
10%, 20% or more or none at all ??
The general consensus is that the M96 engine can score its bores at pretty much any point in its working life therefore I wouldn't pay any premium for a car that has had it's engine replaced "like for like".
Statistically exactly the same. It's like saying "the coin landed heads-up, so next time tails is more likely". In fact, each toss is equally likely to be heads or tails. Your new original engine with the same inherant faults is as likely to fail as your first one.
That was my reason for asking about the rebuilt engines with the weak areas upgraded, over a Porsche replacement engine. [
]
Lol thanks for the maths class I was a derivatives trader in a previous life.
It was tongue in cheek hence the no real premium attached but at least you're getting a reconditioned engine and ancillaries rather than one with wear and tear.
Just to play the devil's advocate, I wouldn't say it is the same thing at all. The chances of a coin landing one way up are 50:50 (almost - it can land on its edge). The chances of an engine going bang are (by various uncorroborated estimates) 1:20. The chances of getting two heads in a row are vastly different from getting two blown engines in a row.
What Paul is saying is whether the engine is replaced or not the odds are still 1:20 of it blowing up - the new engine is just as reliable and the new engine doesn't know or care what happened to the old engine it's still got a 1:20 chance of blowing up ie nothing's changed.
The only advantage in my view are the new ancillaries and the engine being nice and fresh (still with a 1:20 chance of blowing though, but less prone to wear and tear failures like chains etc)
I think they did.
When I had a new engine in my 996 3.6 the suggestion was that basically this was exactly the same as what was being put into brand new (at the time) 997s with RMS version 87 etc. Am sure there were some minor changes at least.
It's still a relatively rare occurrence - for years I was the only PCGB forum user that had the dreaded complete destruction of an engine and I've never heard of anyone being as unlucky a second time with a replacement Porsche engine (which came with 2 year unlimited mileage guarantee).
The replacement didn't come with any Hartech style upgrades or lower temperature thermostats though.
For me, it's once bitten twice shy and I simply wouldn't buy a car with that engine again or the 3.8 Carrera S engine but I accept that is not a statistically sound thought process. I deliberately changed out of my 996 once the replacement engine warranty ran out - but I'm not bitter...
Maybe thee is a statistician on here who can confirm this. The chances of tossing two heads in a row are one in four. The chances of blowing two engines in a row are one in 400. Am I correct?
i just bought the car
£13k porsche bill in 2011 for the engine 25 k ago
serviced every year from 2003 to now at Swindon OPC
1000's spent at the OPC every year
very happy
If a car has not had an engine blow yet then yes the probability of it blowing twice is 0.05x0.05.
In this instance however the car's engine has already blown, so we're replacing probability with fact. We now start afresh. The new engine has a probability of 0.05 of blowing up regardless of what happened before.