fullymatted.
Back to search
PistonHeads

Harnesses only - legal? - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
9 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHHarnesses only - legal? - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK

Leading reported evidence

Replace balance of the whole thing

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Fiddle with one part of that system and it changes the balance of the whole thing.

Harnesses only - legal? - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace balance of the whole thing' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace balance of the whole thing' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 9 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Use "

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

There's a significant difference between "Construction & Use" which is what manufacturers have to achieve for Type Approval compared with the simpler MOT requirements.

Harnesses only - legal? - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace balance of the whole thing

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Fiddle with one part of that system and it changes the balance of the whole thing.

Harnesses only - legal? - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK

Use "

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

There's a significant difference between "Construction & Use" which is what manufacturers have to achieve for Type Approval compared with the simpler MOT requirements.

Harnesses only - legal? - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • PistonHeads: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T053112Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Is it possible to remove the three point seat belt and just have harnesses? (I know that you would need to put a jumper in to fool the seatbelt detector circuit) I have a car that only has harnesses and is road legal but it came that way from the factory, I wonder what the situation is with a GT3

POST 2Original post

I think it may depend on the type of buckle release. I think you're supposed to have a red push button to be legal.

POST 3Original post

Hmm that’s interesting. Pretty much every rally car is road legal, MOT’d and doesn’t have inertia reel seat bents. My mk2 escort has bog standard 5 point harnesses and they’ve never been an issue - and I haven’t ever thought about it

POST 4Original post

According to ChatGPT they need to be e marked (or equivalent BS). Guess I’d better check mine!

POST 5Original post

Lefty said: According to ChatGPT they need to be e marked (or equivalent BS). Guess I d better check mine! But similar to the back seat dilemma, Wouldn't the insurance company rub their hands together if claiming after an accident? Especially if you got injured.

POST 6Original post

I had the seatbelts removed from my R26 and the MoT guy said that rules stated I had to have a 5 point harness, any less wouldn't pass. This was a couple of years ago.

POST 7Original post

my Scuderia only had 4-point harnesses, so must be legal if that is allowed by TÜV for a factory car in Germany Edit: and as far as I am aware Ferrari did not give the option of having both, it was either 3-point belt or harnesses

POST 8Original post

+1 that this is more an insurance than an MOT issue. Most Insurance policies require you to state any modifications. While the MOT checks whether what’s on the vehicle works ( not whether it’s OEM spec or not). Most Caterhams have valid MOTs and a significant number have harnesses (unsure whether they all have 5 or 6 point harnesses).

POST 9Original post

There's a significant difference between "Construction & Use" which is what manufacturers have to achieve for Type Approval compared with the simpler MOT requirements. MOT requirements here https://www.gov.uk/guidance/mot-inspection-manual-... Yes, a modification for insurance. Bear in mind that seat belts and air bags are designed as an integrated system. Fiddle with one part of that system and it changes the balance of the whole thing.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.