22 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHBoss, I crashed your car.
Leading reported evidence
Use car very long
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
So, I guess the boss didn't even get to enjoy his new/used car very long.
Leading evidence: 'Use car very long' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use car very long' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
22 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T222516Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I saw this on the evening news. Add another one to unemployment line!
vehicle+spin+1+DSC_8958.jpg
http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/lo...-Your-Car.html
a testament to the design and structure of even the lowest priced Porsche... barely a scratch after lifting a car nearly twice the weight, window in tact and the window frame holding up the weight of the SUV while the drive sits in a protected zone of safety... Bravo !!
As for the idiot that figured out how to get the car to go fast before he thought about how to slow it down... well, be thankful Porsche thought of you too....
Dumb ****!
Did anyone catch the name of the company this guy worked for and the name of this guy's Boss? I want to apply for the newly vacated position.
Doesn't the tag look like a paper tag?? So, I guess the boss didn't even get to enjoy his new/used car very long.
What would the Carfax commercial say? Last driver used it to jump start his career search??
+1
I used to have a Jeep GC about 10 yrs ago. I got rear ended by a Honda on the freeway. Same thing. Flipped me 180 degrees. The Honda did NOT survive the crash (driver was fine).
You get what you pay for in these vehicles.
I guess a lot of people missed the link under the photo (or just weren't paying good enough attention) so I'll borrow a page out of the IB playbook...
Please follow
this link
for the story behind the photo.
I read the link...
It says the guy took his bosses boxster our for a "spin". When spin is in quotes it kind of makes it sound like he didn't have consent.
Quote:
What kind of ****ing country do you live in where you have to debate whether torturing someone is a crime?
+1
If they are a murderer or a terrorist, you should be able to torture them without having to answer a bunch of silly questions.
