PistonHeads

Any experiences of the ROOCK performance upgrades? - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

5 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHAny experiences of the ROOCK performance upgrades? - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Leading reported evidence

Install so can't give

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I have the roock chip on my 964RS, but not sure you are talking massive gains (I have only ever known the car with it fitted so can't give before/after comparison, but output of my car is good (271bhp) but not amazing (some completely standard 964RSs will hit that figure)
Original post Read captured discussion
Any experiences of the ROOCK performance upgrades? - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Install so can't give' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Install so can't give' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 5 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Install so can't give

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I have the roock chip on my 964RS, but not sure you are talking massive gains (I have only ever known the car with it fitted so can't give before/after comparison, but output of my car is good (271bhp) but not amazing (some completely standard 964RSs will hit that figure)
Original post Read captured discussion
Any experiences of the ROOCK performance upgrades? - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

5 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

PistonHeads: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T175704Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

Sorry no experience, but is 4K really worth 30 php on a car that weighs over a ton? I'm sure you won't really notice the extra bhp, which with probably only come into effect high in the rev range?? Don't want to p**s on you fire but it seems a lot of money for such a small increase. Surely people like RUF an dtechart do are larger conversion for that sort of money? Now the sports suspension IMO is a great choice - will transform the way the car feels. I've driven a C2 with it and it felt great compared to the 993TT handling wise.

POST 2Original post

UV has the kit on his 965 Turbo 2 and raves about it - dunno if anyone has a suitably kitted 996 I have the roock chip on my 964RS, but not sure you are talking massive gains (I have only ever known the car with it fitted so can't give before/after comparison, but output of my car is good (271bhp) but not amazing (some completely standard 964RSs will hit that figure) Cheers Domster

POST 3Original post

930 motorsport offered me a 350bhp upgrade for 4.5k. They're bringing out a supercharger conversion soon too.

POST 4Original post

My 993RS has a Roock sportssytem fitted to it. Claims to increas power from the standard 300 to about 340 (cylinder heads were done by Roock as well). Was told that this cost about £10k. Not sure if I would have paid that myself but was on the car when I bought it. Jim

POST 5 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

...for the 996 (C2 or C4) I'm thinking of having their 30bhp upgrade (ECU remap, plus complete exhaust system incl headers, cat etc.). Costs about £4k incl VAT. I'm also consdiering their sports suspension kit. Advice?

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.