15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH996.1 engine woes
Reported or suspected cause
right thing
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause · Original poster
The car pickup, transportation, labour, oil and filter were all taken care of by the shop that did the IMS, as they felt it was the right thing to do on a car that had an issue shortly after leaving their premises.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Limped the car home (which was close), check codes, of which it had P300 + P302, tried to swap coils (to no avail), and had it flatbedded to the shop that did the IMS.
Leading evidence: 'right thing' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'right thing' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Check codes, of' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause · Original poster
Shortly after my purchase, the car developped a massive ticking noise which turned out to be a stuck lifter on bank 1, that "sorted itself" with an oil change.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
For peace of mind, I elected to have the IMS & clutch replaced immediately after purchase.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause · Original poster
I mentioned this issue in my introduction post, but this section is probably a better place to discuss it.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Check codes, of
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Limped the car home (which was close), check codes, of which it had P300 + P302, tried to swap coils (to no avail), and had it flatbedded to the shop that did the IMS.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Personally, I'd guess at messing around doing the IMS in situ has caused an issue on bank 1, either jumped a tooth or broke the chain tensioner guide..........hence why the like of Hartech and any decent outfit wouldn't go near replacing the IMS bearing in situ.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
This was a seldom driven car before I acquired it (6k miles in 10 years), so I think my more frequent and taxing use might have awoken an existing issue.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
right thing
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause · Original poster
The car pickup, transportation, labour, oil and filter were all taken care of by the shop that did the IMS, as they felt it was the right thing to do on a car that had an issue shortly after leaving their premises.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause · Original poster
Shortly after my purchase, the car developped a massive ticking noise which turned out to be a stuck lifter on bank 1, that "sorted itself" with an oil change.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T152433Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hey guys,
I mentioned this issue in my introduction post, but this section is probably a better place to discuss it.
I recently acquired a 996.1 with a smidge over 40k mile, late 98 build. For peace of mind, I elected to have the IMS & clutch replaced immediately after purchase. IMS was a dual row in perfect condition, so not sure this was very useful.
Shortly after my purchase, the car developped a massive ticking noise which turned out to be a stuck lifter on bank 1, that "sorted itself" with an oil change. The car pickup, transportation, labour, oil and filter were all taken care of by the shop that did the IMS, as they felt it was the right thing to do on a car that had an issue shortly after leaving their premises.
In the following 3-4 months, I drove the car for another 800-900 miles, and noticed it was sometimes a bit shaky on idle, and had a light cold start tick that would go away within a minute. No oil consumption, codes, it had good power delivery and got around 25mpg. Then, all of a sudden (and, as irony would have it, right as I was driving to pick up supplies to make a 911-shaped wooden toy car for my child), driving 50mph on an off-ramp, I downshifted into 5th and cylinder 2 stopped firing. Limped the car home (which was close), check codes, of which it had P300 + P302, tried to swap coils (to no avail), and had it flatbedded to the shop that did the IMS. They found an exhaust valve on cylinder 2 isn't closing all the way, and some traces of water in the oil in that cylinder.
The engine is slated to come out in the next couple of weeks. The head mechanic hopes the issue can be solved without removing the head, which I doubt.
This was a seldom driven car before I acquired it (6k miles in 10 years), so I think my more frequent and taxing use might have awoken an existing issue.
Does this sound familiar to anyone here? Any advice / opinion?
I'll keep you posted as I get more info.
Alex
Has it had a rebuild? OP hasn't said that.
Personally, I'd guess at messing around doing the IMS in situ has caused an issue on bank 1, either jumped a tooth or broke the chain tensioner guide..........hence why the like of Hartech and any decent outfit wouldn't go near replacing the IMS bearing in situ. Being cynical, that's why the place that's done the IMS bearing are covering all this work. Good luck resolving it.
The engine hasn't had a rebuild that I'm aware of. And being it still had a dual row IMS, I'm pretty sure it's on its original engine. Also, FWIW the car was under PA for the first 10 years of its life.
I agree I wouldn't do the IMS again were I given the choice. Live and learn. That being said, I'm not sure messing around with it could have led to this issue.
I was also hoping it would be a timing issue, but only
one
of the exhaust valves on cylinder 2 isn't closing. So that pretty much rules out timing or Variocam issue.
Cracked head seems a possibility though I struggle to see how it could prevent the valve from closing. Unless the crack extended to the valve seat? Also, cracked head is supposed to be strictly a 00-01 thing, and this car is a late 98, which apparently don't suffer from the issue.
The IMS was changed with the engine out, FWIW. And since the issue appeared all of a sudden, 1 000 miles later, and since the car had good power before (170+ on a short stint on the Autobahn), I'm still not sure how it could be linked to bad IMS work (yet). Unless I'm mistaken, the issue showed by Lee should have been -noisily- apparent on first startup.
The shop just told me they've pulled the engine yesterday and will remove the cam cover Monday, so I should know more shortly.
Provided that engine isn't a clusterf*ck, what are the
while-you're-in-there's
I should consider? AOS is on the list, oil cooler & pipes are recent, I was thinking of having them check the starter cables and engine / Gbox mounts. Also the DMF as I had doubts about its health. Clutch's new, so I don't need to change it.
Anything else?
Engine in / engine out, same thing - it's still done in situ, i.e. extracting the bearing from the engine, rather than stripping the engine, removing the shaft and removing the bearing from the shaft on the bench. Doing it in situ means you have a likely possibility of damaging or moving anything connected to the shaft, so chains, chain guides, sprockets. Once something moves or gets damaged, the valve timing on that bank can change. Bank 1 valves are driven by the ims bearing end of the shaft. If anything goes wrong doing the bearing, it wall virtually always be bank 1 valves that suffer. Yes it could be a coincidene, but I know many would hedge their bets on it being related.
Hey Alex,
I get what you're saying, but this scenario would affect all valves on a cam, wouldn't it? And in this case it looks like only one of the six exhaust valves on bank 1 isn't closing. Which, to me (and the shop) rules out timing.
So far my indie thinks it's a broken valve spring. I had my money on a bad lifter but can't fathom how it would prevent a valve from closing. Broken valve seat is another contender.
Not sure. I get what you're saying and that would be the case when running, but if the cam wasn't locked when they did the job and somethings moved during the extraction of the bearing, whether it's possible for a piston to be at TDC and the cam has turned slightly pressing the valve against the piston? I suppose all will be revealed once its opened up.
Sorry, I'm not meaning to be negative toward you problem but just off experience, coincidences are far too familiar on here after someone's had some work done.
So I just received some pictures from the shop, and the cause it NOT what I expected...
Apparently, someone had mounted the exhaust gasket on bank 1 the wrong way around which led to some of the gasket protruding in the exhaust channels. With time, heat and airflow, those protruding bits tore off and got sucked back into the cylinder, where in this case the bit lodged itself firmly between the valve seat and exhaust valve.
Interestingly, this happend on all three cylinders but only #2 seems to have gotten its gasket piece stuck into the valve.
The head surface is a little worse for wear, but nothing terrible. Cylinders seems intact and so do the valves.