15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHMileage 'Clocking'
Reported or suspected cause
true reading
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
If average speed is 40-50 mph over the life of the car then that’s probably a true Reading but if it works out to be 10-20 mph average then there is something an mis.
Leading evidence: 'true reading' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'true reading' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Check condition of the seats steering wheel etc' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Also you can check the condition of the seats steering wheel etc.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Check the ECU for "hours" and work out the average.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Use / recorded mileage showed a factor of 35mph average
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I remember looking at car back in the day where the hours of use / recorded mileage showed a factor of 35mph average but the car generally did not "feel right" with general wear and tear.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
true reading
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
If average speed is 40-50 mph over the life of the car then that’s probably a true Reading but if it works out to be 10-20 mph average then there is something an mis.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T122219Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I've just bought a 2004 996 with quite low miles, 65k. It has a stamped service book and all the mots show the mileage to look accurate.
A friend earlier today says he thinks the last 5 years (less than 700 miles) looks dodgy and said that he thinks the milage might have been adjusted.
Is there any way an independent or main dealer can check in the car to see if its been adjusted ?
Many thanks
Not 100% sure but don't think you can.
Tell your mate it's more common for a 20 year old 911 to only have done 700 miles in it's latter 5 years of its life than it is finding one clocked. Probably best chance you have is to look at the date on the tyres. If they're 5 years old, then the mileage is correct.
You can scan the the ecu it says how many hours the engine has run for that will give you and indication. Basically with this info you can work out the average speed. If average speed is 40-50 mph over the life of the car then that’s probably a true Reading but if it works out to be 10-20 mph average then there is something an mis. Unless it’s spent all its life in London traffic
Also you can check the condition of the seats steering wheel etc. mine has a few shiney patches at 130k but no rips of scuffs
You can check the MOT history at
https://www.check-mot.service.gov.uk/
which will give you the car's mileage at each test. That will show pretty easily if there's anything dodgy going on.
This is the good thing about the MOT history online.
It means that any mileage fraud will have to be perpetrated every year prior to an MOT test
It would take several years to make a meaningful difference to the value of the car, and hence would need to be done by a long-term owner with access to 'mileage correction' equipment.
Even if this was the case, 700 miles in several years is as much of a question mark for potential buyers as would be a further 40k, albeit for different reasons.
low mileage over 5 years, quite normal
MOT and service history checks out then should be all good
Your friend needs to provide better evidence to support his opinion
Unless you have a second speedo that you can swap in/out in 5mins on the air-cooled cars. You have to be very very careful provenencing the mileage with these.
Mileage clocking usually takes place in the first 3 years as there is no MOT to check and that’s when it will at it’s most lucrative.
You must be very happy with the condition of the car, so “put the idea to bed” and enjoy
My Turbo did a similar mileage in 15yrs ! It was in storage /collection. I bought it with 8300miles on it 2yrs ago. The only problem I had was the fuel sender unit in the tank had corroded quite badly and not working due to lack of fuel.
The above is correct but I'd suggest that 30-40 is the the likely average speed to expect for a UK car unless it's done a lot of motorway miles. It's actually quite difficult to average 40+ over a long period of mixed road use.
This ie average mileage used as a conversion in the UK is surprisingly low. Most modern cars can actually give you this data ie using one of various trip meters avaialble for long term use. I seem to recollect that "back in the day" a factor of x27.5 was used to convert engine hours to miles as a "sense" check to see if the recorded mileage of a car in the UK was about right or should raise alarm bells to explain a signficant variances ie was it used out of the norm eg 60,000 miles in one year the 27.5 should be higher as it would imply more than average motorway use. I remember looking at car back in the day where the hours of use / recorded mileage showed a factor of 35mph average but the car generally did not "feel right" with general wear and tear. I think I was told then that 35 was too high for the car and it had likely been clocked.
As stated above clocking is more likely in the first 3 years ie lease cars with mileage penalties. I once knew of a Lambo that was clocked back too far and the owner spent a week trying to put some mileage back on it
Of course aircooled porsche are measured in the thickness of the storage dust (there are a few tricks that you can check for
)
For Ref: the above car has been clocked every year for the last few years (as seen in the MOT history) showing the car has done 300 miles per year. The correct mileage is about half a mile!! It's still running on 2* petrol.
I definately did 6 miles in it last year (I moved it back home to the garage from storage after building works.
It even had a wash to reset the "dust" mileometer
Edit: wrong pic I just got excited at seeing it again
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.