Planet-9

Poor Judgment ???

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

5 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHPoor Judgment ???

Leading reported evidence

Use pretty poor judgment

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed
It seems someone may have used pretty poor judgment.
Original post Read captured discussion
Poor Judgment ???

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use pretty poor judgment' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use pretty poor judgment' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 5 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Use pretty poor judgment

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed
It seems someone may have used pretty poor judgment.
Original post Read captured discussion
Poor Judgment ???

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

5 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

Planet-9: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T044418Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

It seems someone may have used pretty poor judgment. Looking at the amount of front end damage considering this happened in a densely populated residential area where the posted speed limit is about 35 or 40 MPH. https://www.myveronanj.com/2019/07/07/first-responders-resident-save-2-from-fiery-crash/ https://www.northjersey.com/story/n...7/08/porche-catches-fire-after-slamming-into-utility-pole-verona-nj/1673679001/

POST 2Original post

That one ain't gonna buff out. Looks like the driver probably got what he/she deserved.

POST 3Original post

Current score: Physics - infinity Those who ignore physics - zero

POST 4Original post

-- Not much left to salvage - maybe the rear license plate bracket... Guessing a late night/early morn street race - and looks like the other guy got away...

POST 5Original post

Bypassing any commentary on judgment, etc., I will say "hats off" to Porsche for the safety design that allowed both passengers to be able to walk away from this crash...

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.