15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHExploring what the 996 turbo PSM actually does
Leading reported evidence
Use here is awd
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Use here is awd' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Test tc' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Yep, that definitely the clever way of testing the TC.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T100758Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
CAUTION, NERD CONTENT!
I have a job to do for work to collect some brake testing data next week, in preparation I have been getting my car set up and whilst I was at it I thought I would update what data I am pulling from CAN and add a few more channels if I could. I am now getting enough data to have a look at what the traction control system does on the car when activated. As I know some of you are as inquisitive as I am, I thought I would share what I have found.
2nd gear, 4000rpm, cold but dry road, slightly uphill. Accelerating briskly and I managed to provoke the traction control.
Top to bottom on the graphs are:
Throttle position
Front brake pressure (Front right)
Rear brake pressure (Rear right)
Manifold pressure
Actual throttle angle
Basic ignition timing
Actual ignition timing
Rear right wheel speed
Front right wheel speed
Actual engine load
Ratio between average front and wheel speeds (<1 means rears are going faster)
All data is from CAN bus except for the two brake pressures which are from pressure transducers in two brake lines.
At this point on the graph boost is building, 0.9bar, actual and basic ignition angles are the same, throttle is wide open and the rear wheels are going about 3.5% faster than the fronts, all is fine and the traction control isn't doing anything.
Here the right rear is at 90km/h and the right front is at 75km/h. The rears are going about 12% faster than the fronts and the traction control is just about to step in.
I zoomed in slightly for this one, entire graph is around 2s of data here.
Traction control has now intervened, boost level is dropping, rear brakes have been applied but the throttle is still open. Ignition is being pulled by up to 6 degrees. At this point the rear wheels have regained traction.
By this point the rear wheels have well and truly gained traction but the throttle is being closed and the rear brakes are still being applied. For a short time afterwards there is also slight pressure on the front brakes.
So, it appears that the traction control starts to activate at a slip ratio of somewhere around 10%, it works by pulling ignition timing and reducing boost, as well as throttle control. It also seems to overreact and keep the power off for much longer than is actually needed!
As I was just on a public road I wasn't exactly going balls-out on this one. If I get a chance next week when doing more testing I'll push it a bit harder and see if I can see anything else interesting.
MC
Nice work MC!!! This is interesting. I always thought that the PSM just cut the throttle when it spotted slip. That is just what my arse on the seat has told me. Interesting to know that it does add in some braking too! Mine is more or less permanently off though as it is so OTT. With it on it is more or less impossible for me to open the throttle without it going in to melt down!
I always thought it reduced power and applied the brakes to any particular wheel it needs to. I'm sure i've felt it braking the right front when taking a right hander too fast in order to help pull the car around the corner for example..
Whilst I'm sure its primitive compared to modern TC units, I think it was pretty good in its day.
My old 4S used to eat pads if I left PSM on when on track, but didn't if i switched it off.
Loving the data by the way MC, more of the same please!
:thumb:
Yep, that definitely the clever way of testing the TC.
You can do it this way too:
https://youtu.be/ad2rForYHD0?t=1m28s
Yes, was deliberate and no, I did not shift my foot off the throttle once after turn-in, all that was done by the systems. Don't try this at home etc. etc.
Ragpicker- that's the abs doing its job when the fronts brake on a corner.
Its a bit of a flawed system if you ask me. You'd think applying throttle whilst braking the rears would be to power the fronts whilst restricting the reas, but thats not possible due to the design of the awd system.
Interesting data mate. Nice one. :thumb:
I am either learning something new or confused (or both) :dont know:
'For a short time afterwards there is also slight pressure on the front brakes'.
My understanding of traction control was management of the drive through the driving wheels. ie cutting the power or braking the rears in a two wheel drive car.
If brakes are being applied to the front wheels (for traction control), what is the difference to this and Porsche Stability Management? I'm aware the PSM receives data from other sensors like Steering angle, so it controls stability rather than straightfowrad traction control. Is that the difference? Is PSM a form of traction control as it controls wheel slip?
:?
PSM is traction control, but it monitors more variables and collects more data so that is can control the car better, ie. Stability Management.
Don't forget, the car used here is awd. The operation of psm may differ slightly on a rwd car.
Edit: maybe title should be exploring the PSM?
Very interesting MC, good work.
I'm intrigued, does the car have a yaw sensor and if so, does this get taken into account when the TC is activated?
I agree with your findings too, the intrusion is altogether too 'long', in fact if you were to get the car sliding around a corner by stamping the throttle to the floor, the throttle is closed completely until you lift off... Found this out a couple of years ago on a hoon. In other words, all power was cut to save the car from a slide because the throttle was wide open, but it would not reinstate any power until coming off the loud pedal. It would be interesting to see which of the many parameters triggered this scenario.
Meanwhile, keep up the logging! :worship:
There is a yaw sensor, as the data from this available over CAN, no idea how this is taken in to account, I don't plan to try to get it out of shape on a bend on the road.
Roll on Monday for some testing at Bruntingthorpe where I will have the full INS setup (roll, pitch and yaw rates and angles) and will be able to throw it around a lot more on slicks. I'll post an update after that.
There is a lot less information for when the ABS is activated, all I can see is a single flag to show it is operating and the values from the pressure sensors and wheel speeds.
MC
:thumbs: thank you for sharing
i have occasionally thought that it was a bit clumsy when it does intervene (2nd gear on a 180Deg hillclimb last month for example) in that it really bogs down (logically cuts power and also brakes the wheel(s) losing traction but maybe too much?) but conversely i have also been very grateful at times over the years
Definitely wouldn't be without it :grin:
^^ +1.
Excellent post. Bordering on being above my level of understanding but I'm with it so far.
Well done on putting it into layman's terms. :thumb:
I always find these systems too intrusive, although obviously as time goes on they become more and more advanced.