15 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHExpansion tank not covered under warranty?
Leading reported evidence
Replace under warranty by opc east london
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
when i had my 996 cab 02 model expansion tank leaking replaced under warranty by opc east london
Leading evidence: 'Replace under warranty by opc east london' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace /' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
If you bought it from an OPC, IMO you should ask them to replace/repair it at no expense to you.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Are you sure it was replaced under warranty or because you bought your car from an OPC not long before?
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T152433Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi
Had my 01 facelift C4 serviced on Sat at East London OPC and was advised I needed to have the coolant expansion tank replaced as it was leaking (a split apparently). I was told on the day that this was covered under the warranty, so no worries. However, I was called today and told that in fact this is not covered under the warranty!
The OPC are in the process of calling the OPC where I bought the car (3 months ago) to see if they will cover the cost and I am awaiting their answer.
Does anyone out there know if it is or not, as I would have thought it was?
Many thanks
Dazzler
If you bought it from an OPC, IMO you should ask them to replace/repair it at no expense to you. Mention the words, "merchantable quality" and "fitness for purpose". If through a garage, use the same expressions. If it was a private purchase, have a look at the contract of sale [if you have one].
Hi
Thanks for your reply. Yes I bought it from OPC Aberdeen in July and OPC East London are awaiting their reply on whether they will pay for it. Are you saying that it is not covered under the Porsche extended warranty then?
Regards
Dazzler
So sorry, I know nothing about the warranty and, in any event, the contract might be covered by Scottish law - and I assume that their consumer laws differ from ours.
Good luck.
The point that I am making is that Dazzler has only owned the car since July 2007 and it would not be reasonable for such a fault to occur within such a short time. This must have ben a pre-exisitng fault/problem and the OPC should accept responsibility, regardless of the warranty.
If anyone pays a [large] sum of money for a vehicle, they are entitled to think that there will not be a substantial claim for any fault for which they are not responsible. This is the position [in general terms] in English law. As for the Scots ...
The way I've heard OPCs wriggle out of it is that they treat the tank as a "wear" item. I doubt if you would get anywhere by persuing it, but I guess it's worth a try.
Hi
Ok, a happy end!!
Just spoke to East London OPC and it turns out Aberdeen OPC have agreeed to pay for the tank, so all good.
Also on another point, East London OPC give 10% discount on parts to PCGB members - saving me about £62.
Thanks for your replies and help
Regards
Dazzler
Good result!
A facelift replacement tank is only around £50 from Eurocarparts...it's really the labour that's expensive (at an OPC around £220+VAT).....are they doing that FOC as well?
Richard, I don't think you have been proven wrong. I don't believe they will be fixing it as a warranty claim, but because of what Julian mentioned - you can't expect to buy a car in July and have the expansion tank go so soon.
I'm sure they will call it a 'Good will gesture' though.
As Richard mentioned, the expansion tank is NOT covered under the Extended Warranty, and only a goodwill gesture will see it fixed FOC (if that is indeed what they are doing and not just supplying the tank FOC).
Hey Chris...are u still counting the days?[
]
OPC East London told me it wasn't covered when I put in a claim just this March. Are you sure it was replaced under warranty or because you bought your car from an OPC not long before?
Hi all
Wow, I've started quite a debate here!
Just to clarify, the work was done on Sat at the time of the service as I was told then it was covered under the warranty. It was only today I was called and told it wasn't. However, OPC EL sorted it all out with OPC Ab, as a good will gesture I believe, so all fine, done and dusted.
Regards
Dazzler
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.