4 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHHartech - warranty
Reported or suspected cause
broken valve spring costing peanuts
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
I had to have a full engine out job to fix what I thought was a blown engine, which thankfully turned out to be a broken valve spring costing peanuts.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
RMS is a classic example of where, in my opinion, the scheme really is good - if you need it changing when you're on the plan the cost would be pennies for the seal and maybe a few quid if they replace the oil.
Leading evidence: 'broken valve spring costing peanuts' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'broken valve spring costing peanuts' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace oil' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
RMS is a classic example of where, in my opinion, the scheme really is good - if you need it changing when you're on the plan the cost would be pennies for the seal and maybe a few quid if they replace the oil.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
As far as I know most of the cost in replacing the RMS is labour which you don't pay for.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
RMS is a classic example of where, in my opinion, the scheme really is good - if you need it changing when you're on the plan the cost would be pennies for the seal and maybe a few quid if they replace the oil.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Replace oil
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
RMS is a classic example of where, in my opinion, the scheme really is good - if you need it changing when you're on the plan the cost would be pennies for the seal and maybe a few quid if they replace the oil.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
RMS is a classic example of where, in my opinion, the scheme really is good - if you need it changing when you're on the plan the cost would be pennies for the seal and maybe a few quid if they replace the oil.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
4 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T122219Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Has anyone got the Hartech warranty?
I'm just about to go through a big service and thinking of the Porsche warranty renewal!!
But this seems an equally good option!
Or am I missing something?
RMS??!! Deep sigh! Should I be paranoid about this or not?? .. plus other bits!
Hope not as it looks very impressive!
I've been on it for 2 or 3 years now - there's no catch it's as good as you read it to be and I;ve always found them to be true gents to deal with.
RMS is a classic example of where, in my opinion, the scheme really is good - if you need it changing when you're on the plan the cost would be pennies for the seal and maybe a few quid if they replace the oil. As far as I know most of the cost in replacing the RMS is labour which you don't pay for.
I had to have a full engine out job to fix what I thought was a blown engine, which thankfully turned out to be a broken valve spring costing peanuts. I think the whole job came to a couple of hundred quid for the parts including replacement oil.
The thing that turned me on to it was that it covers wear and tear too. With my 996 coming up to 100,000 miles I needed a fair bit of suspension work doing a few months ago, I paid for parts only (and they are at a reasonable cost) I imagine the labour would have been hundreds if not £1k+ for the amount of work that was done.
To be honest I feel guilty sometimes when works needs to be done, which reminds me I need to book it in for a service which is due on 18/11, that's included in the monthly cost too of course!
Mines a 98 car so this will be its last year where it can have the Porsche warranty. Which everyone says have as it does cover lots and lots!!
The prospect of say £6K for major engine work would be a tough one to swallow sooooooo........!!
more and more appealing......
Guess I should read the small print!! Or the actual document first!!
