fullymatted.
Back to search
986Forum

Reverse Rake after Corner Balance Normal? - 986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
6 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHReverse Rake after Corner Balance Normal? - 986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners

Leading reported evidence

Replace when it’s time

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

I guess I’ll just drive the heck out of it for now and worry about changes when it’s time for a new set of tires.

Reverse Rake after Corner Balance Normal? - 986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace when it’s time' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace when it’s time' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 6 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace when it’s time

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

I guess I’ll just drive the heck out of it for now and worry about changes when it’s time for a new set of tires.

Reverse Rake after Corner Balance Normal? - 986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

6 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • 986Forum: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T013556Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

After getting my PSS9s installed, I had the car aligned and corner balanced. I asked them to start around ROW M030 height and go from there. When they were done the car seemed a little low in the rear, but it was hard to tell without measuring. After a couple test drives, I measured the ride height front and rear (based on the locations in the service manual) and got about 125mm in the front and 107mm in the back (minor variation side to side). So it has a reverse rake. However, the corner balance numbers look good (cross numbers anyway). LF: 763/24% RF: 728/23% LR: 861/27% RR: 827/26% I'm not sure what they were measuring, but they listed the ride heights as: LF: 25.625 RF: 25.625 LR: 25.125 RR: 25.375 Does this seem right? I was really hoping for 125-130mm in the front and 130-135mm in the rear. I'm not sure I can live with 107mm in the rear without bottoming out.

POST 2Original post

did you measure with your equivalent weight in the driver seat?

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 655964

I did not, but I will do that. I’ve got a bunch of weights I can use.

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I loaded 180lbs in the driver seat and checked again. Numbers did not change much. Maybe a little higher in the front.

POST 5 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I spoke to the p-car shop and he said that’s usually how they set them up for handling (rear a little lower than front) to help prevent the car from diving under breaking. His Boxster is set up similarly. I guess I’ll just drive the heck out of it for now and worry about changes when it’s time for a new set of tires.

POST 6Original post

This is about right, my 996 is setup with a little extra weight on the rear for traction. The 986 is setup about the same, don’t have the exact numbers handy. Shawn

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.