14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHStandard Porsche Alarm
Leading reported evidence
Run gear is superb
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Run gear is superb' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run gear is superb' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Use open (non-lsd) type differential and electrickery :roll
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
After this PSM was introduced which uses an open (non-LSD) type differential and electrickery :roll:
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T144035Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi guys,
Just a quick one. Trying to sort out the
insurance
for my car...just had a question about the alarm.
The standard Porsche full closure system, does it rate equivalent to a Thatcham or anything else etc?
Or do i just tell my insurance co. that it is a standard fit Porsche alarm?
Cheers guys,
Taran :?:
Thanks Maxie!
Picking it up finally on Wednesday...can't wait!
http://911uk.com/viewtopic.php?t=15193&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=88
Some pics here...will take some more once i get it home!
Taran :!:
Hi
I`ve only just purchased mine and was told by the
insurance
company that the industry very much rates the standard fit alarm/immobiliser. So much so, that a Tracker only reduces the premium by £35 per annum !!!
some
insurance
companies insist on a tracker.
you're opc will give you a letter confirming that it has a thatcham 1 alarm (but might charge for it!).
when the car was sold new, the OPC gives you a letter confirming it is thatcham 1 (at least Guildford did).
Excellent choice!
I think the M030 sport running gear is superb. I compare the purity of turn-in and instantaneous chassis reaction with the Lotus Elise. But of course you have a glorious F6 at your disposal as opposed to the Elise's awful 'hair dryer' soundtrack :lol:
I'm pretty sure you have the 99MY which may have the optional M220 locking differential (LSD). The amount of 'plant' and drive the 996 has with LSD is phenominal, especially with the sport-rate dampers and springs.
Yeh, i wouldn't have a 996 without the MO30 box ticked!
How can you tell if it is a 99MY? From the chassis no. it's a 1998 i think. I can't remeber seein the 220 option code on the VIL's, but will check it out when i get the car back home!
Taran 8)
The VIN contains this information. It should start 'WP0 ZZZ' followed by the vehicle type in two digits, e.g. 99. The digits correlate to the model year.
99MY can also be identified by clear indicator lenses but is not 100% reliable due to aftermarket conversions! I believe the 99MY also has better side impact protection or Porsche SIP.
My understanding of M220 is that it was optional on the 99MY C2 only (unkown as to why not the 98MY too :?
. After this PSM was introduced which uses an open (non-LSD) type differential and electrickery :roll:
Forgive me if i'm wrong, but I think it's the nomenclature after the 99 that tells you the model year. I.e WPOZZZ99ZW is 98MY, WPOZZZ99ZX is 99MY and so on...
Taran :idea:
Ah yes I'm talking out of my **** . Digit 10 is MY. Just found this on the web (though my not be clear):
DIGIT: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
EXAMPLE: W P 0 Z Z Z 9 9 Z W S 6 0 0 1 2 5
=== = = = =============
! ! ! ! !
VEHICLE TYPE 1ST+2ND DIGIT----------------+ ! ! ! !
! ! ! !
MODEL YEAR----------------------------------------+ ! ! !
! ! !
MANUFACTURING LOCATION--------------------------------+ ! !
! !
VEHICLE TYPE 3RD DIGIT------------------------------------+ !
!
SERIAL NUMBER-------------------------------------------------------+
It gets worse because manufacturers will build cars that meet the following year specifications, i.e. a 996 built in '98 may well be a 99'Model Year'. Don't know if you could add anything to this?
What I'm after is an original brochure that details all the specs and options of the period. My particular car has option 'M014 SPORT PACKAGE 996' but there is currently no way for me to tell what the package consists. I don't NEED to know but I'm bored and it's hissing down outside :x
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.