5 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH2002 996 turbo changed to ULEZ not compliant at TFL
Leading reported evidence
Replace lol how come
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
2002 996 turbo changed to ULEZ not compliant at TFL
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Replace lol how come' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace lol how come' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Don’t email them either with the CoC & V5 use the document upload facility on the TfL ULEZ site otherwise they don’t reply if my experience is anything to go by despite sending 3 times to the correct email address.
2002 996 turbo changed to ULEZ not compliant at TFL
Use document upload facility
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Don’t email them either with the CoC & V5 use the document upload facility on the TfL ULEZ site otherwise they don’t reply if my experience is anything to go by despite sending 3 times to the correct email address.
2002 996 turbo changed to ULEZ not compliant at TFL
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
5 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T124918Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
ULEZ status changed lol How come!?!
Previous years, I did check my 02 996 turbo is definitely ULEZ compliant and I did drove it many times inside the ULEZ zone without any charge.
This morning I just randomly checking again and found it shows a charge regarding to my plate, how can this happen and do I have to abuse it since I drove it inside the zone for 3 days this week.
TFL have a right hand left hand problem.
I have helped a few get their cars 'approved' and it is getting harder to get TFL to get their act together.
Your car will be exempt if the NOX level is 0.08g/kms or less. That is all that counts.
For example my 2000 volvo V70 has a NOX reading of 0.036g/kms. So quite straightforward yes. No. It took 8 weeks and the intervention of my London assembly rep to get TFL to get their finger out after sending me 3, yes 3 refusals.
If you phone them you will be on hold for 20+ minutes unless the demand has died down, so get emailling and have your COC scanned and ready along with all 4 pages of your V5.
If your NOX reading is greater than the above, you are metaphorically stuffed.
But try it anyway as they sometimes make a mistake in your favour :lol:
Don’t email them either with the CoC & V5 use the document upload facility on the TfL ULEZ site otherwise they don’t reply if my experience is anything to go by despite sending 3 times to the correct email address.
Thanks mates, I have filled both sections of file a complain and my car is ULEZ compliant, let see what happens, but the v5c has no CO2 data and I don't have any prove at all, but for a 02 Turbo it is and was complaint.
Anyways looks like I have to expect fine notice sending to me for driving into zone 3 days this week.
That is why you need the certificate of conformity from Porsche. Without it you are not compliant in the eyes of TFL.
I emailled copies of my coc and V5 and 'also' was rejected 3 times as they 'could not find either the V5 or the COC despite bothe being attached to each of the emails.
It was when my London assembly member got involved that they found both documents and issues a letter of compliance (along with a truly grovelling letter to the Member.
best of luck.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
