6 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHGeometry and tyres
Leading reported evidence
Adjust before you get new tyres
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Definitely get it checked and adjusted before you get new tyres.
Leading evidence: 'Adjust before you get new tyres' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Adjust before you get new tyres' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I reckon it's worth getting checked every 2 years, but I use mine daily.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I had a geometry check done by a local indi for £160; it made a noticable difference to the handling and is a lot cheaper than the OPC price.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Obviously depends on your location, but a check over was suggested at £75...
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Would be a nice run over to them, they will do it while you wait as well.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
6 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T165820Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi everyone
After having the car for about 3 weeks, it is now settling down very nicely, particularly after a few bits and pieces being done at Autowerke Norwich.
I've been wondering if there's anything I can do with the twitchyness at approx 60-80mph. The front tyres wear a lot more on the inside than outside and there may be a bit of stepping so new tyres may help. Though I noticed in the OPC service leaflet I've got that they can look at the geometry setup for about £250. Have any of you guys had this done?
Cheers,
Alex
Chris Franklin toured a lot of the regions and suggested that he could help with any of these issues.
Obviously depends on your location, but a check over was suggested at £75... now thats alot cheaper than a set of tyres [
]
Short answer is probably Yes..
garyw
I reckon it's worth getting checked every 2 years, but I use mine daily. If your front tyres are wearing on the inside, you don't have enough toe in, or too much negative camber. It the fronts are running parallel or toe-out it will make it twitchy in a straight line. Definitely get it checked and adjusted before you get new tyres. A good indy, as Gary suggests, will be a lot cheaper than an OPC. You can get the alignment specs from the Technical Articles pages.
Cheers for that advice. I've just had a word with Chris Franklin who was extremely helpful and I'll book the car in to him in a few days, I'll post about it afterwards as it might be useful for other newbies like myself....
Give Andy at Promax Motorsport a call
http://www.promaxmotorsport.com/
Nice guys, and Much Much cheaper than OPC.
They did an excellent job on my GT3 RS a few months ago, They did my old GT3 and 993 also, always very pleased with there work and attitude.
Would be a nice run over to them, they will do it while you wait as well.
Regards.......
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
