15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH996 - I-Pod !
Leading reported evidence
Check which i have
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I will check which I have when I get home tonight !
Leading evidence: 'Check which i have' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check which i have' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Anyone recommend a good supplier which actually has stock?
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I bought one of those leads off fleabay to use on my cdr-23, it doesn't work!
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T130754Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Thanks Daniel,
I am actually. I tried one of the Dension things that refused to work with my CDR-22 head unit and ended up sending it back for a refund. While this isn't AS good as one of those, it's near enough......
I was getting to the point of thinking about getting a new head unit....
Regards,
Jeff
Jeff, better to get a Becker unit from the Traffic Pro range and get the benefits of integrated sat nav and ipod compatability with that OEM Porsche look, as the crd-22 is just too weak, regards
Did you enable the Aux input on the unit? You have to get into the menu for it somehow by holding down one of the buttons for 8 seconds when you turn on the unit.
If after enabling the Aux in it still didn't work I'll save my money.
Ta.
I only found that one out digging through the internet trying to get the damn Dension thing working. It was hard to get it to go as well. I think enabling Aux disables the CD-Changer as well.....
Regards,
Jeff
I'm seriously considering going for the Becker 7990 unit as I already have a Tomtom to get me lost. Anyone recommend a good supplier which actually has stock?
Thanks all,
Jeff
there are a few options on a google search
http://www.caraudiodiscount.com/acatalog/becker_grand_prix.html
but who ever you get make sure they have the Becker iPOD lead in stock !
Note, the lead only works up to 4th Gen of Ipods which was a 40GB drive.
I've got an Ipod nano 1st gen. I think it will work with it right .... however will I get caught out later.... maybe they will release a new adapter later to support the newer Ipods....
Thanks.
This maybe what I have ??
Is it a Beker Grand Prix ? I bought one for mine as I wanted the Blue Tooth..
I will check which I have when I get home tonight !
Daniel you do have the grand prix (as do i, unless you've changed it since).
Got mine from Car audio discount as per link above and saved around £70 on most places i'd seen. quick service too.
don;t forget to ask for the orange/yellow backlight too, keeps the OEM feel in the car (they also do red, green blue etc)
Damn it. I have contacted them and they can't confirm if it would work or not with a 1st gen nano. I will therefore not be buying at this ponit because I can be sure it won't work. It's my luck ......
Regards,
Jeff
It's most likely that at the time of printing your manual, Apple were only up to the 4th generation iPod. It doesn't necessarily preclude later generations that came out after the manual was printed... ...
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
