fullymatted.
Back to search
911uk

M030 Suspension Upgrade on a 1999 C2 Cab?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
9 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHM030 Suspension Upgrade on a 1999 C2 Cab?

Leading reported evidence

Install mo30 kit

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I've got the factory fitted MO30 kit on my 99 C2 cab weekend wonder.

M030 Suspension Upgrade on a 1999 C2 Cab?
Frequently discussed work

Fill arches nicely

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Lowers the body by 30mm and gives it a really purposeful stance and the wheels fill the arches nicely.

M030 Suspension Upgrade on a 1999 C2 Cab?
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Install mo30 kit' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'good idea not' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Fill arches nicely' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 9 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 2 other evidence results

good idea not

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause · Original poster

Never mind new springs and new shocks was probably a good idea not to mention the M030 antiroll bars which definitely weren't on there previously!

M030 Suspension Upgrade on a 1999 C2 Cab?

Fill arches nicely

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Lowers the body by 30mm and gives it a really purposeful stance and the wheels fill the arches nicely.

M030 Suspension Upgrade on a 1999 C2 Cab?
Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Fill arches nicely

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Lowers the body by 30mm and gives it a really purposeful stance and the wheels fill the arches nicely.

M030 Suspension Upgrade on a 1999 C2 Cab?

Install mo30 kit

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I've got the factory fitted MO30 kit on my 99 C2 cab weekend wonder.

M030 Suspension Upgrade on a 1999 C2 Cab?
Reported and suspected causes (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

good idea not

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause · Original poster

Never mind new springs and new shocks was probably a good idea not to mention the M030 antiroll bars which definitely weren't on there previously!

M030 Suspension Upgrade on a 1999 C2 Cab?
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • 911uk: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T205155Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I've read enough to believe that pre-2002 Cabs should NOT be fitted with PSS-9s or X74 suspension due to body flex issues. That leaves me asking if the M030 kit is a worthwhile upgrade? Has anyone had this upgrade done on a similar car? Would be grateful for any wisdom you can hand down on this!

POST 2Original post

I've got the factory fitted MO30 kit on my 99 C2 cab weekend wonder. Lowers the body by 30mm and gives it a really purposeful stance and the wheels fill the arches nicely. Can't comment on the flex though, surely all cabs would suffer from flex anyhow (70% less rigid than the coupé is the figure i've heard) so the various suspension upgrades would have a similar effect?

POST 3Original post

Wonder if the later C4S and indeed Turbo Cabs had this M030 fitment anyway? ~ Maxie

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Hi Tim. My understanding is that with a firmer setup, there is more grip hence higher forces acting on the chasis. M030 is less punishing than X74. Do you feel the M030 difference mainly on the track or is there some benefit on the road too? It's about 700 +VAT for parts and same again for labour (inc. geometry.) Sounds like a good improvement for the cost... 70% :shock: Maybe I should sell up and get a coup :lol:

POST 5Original post

can't say i've been on track... it is a firm ride but no more than i'd expect from a sports car, i have no real comparitor since this is my first 911 though...

POST 6 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Tempted? http://www.911uk.com/viewtopic.php?t=16371 I've only been once and really keen to back! Bedford is great for us 'learners'.

POST 7 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

M030 and a measuring tape? Before the car went to JZM I measured the distance from the bottom of the GT3 kit side skirts to the ground = 13cm. Also the shortest distance (vertical line) from the bottom of the wing arch to the alloy rim = 9cm front and back. I suspect this was pretty low to start with? The car came back with the new set up looking the same except at the back wheels arch was around 1 cm FURTHER from the rim = 10cm. I had gone with the M030 upgrade and the H+R lowering springs (hence have spare springs if anyone is interested). I know it's a Sunday and all but if anyone can be ar$ed mking those measurements on their car I'd be very interested and grateful

POST 8Original post

I've got the M030 too, 10cm rim to arch and 14cm skirt to ground....

POST 9 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Thanks dervish. Doh - I think I already had lowering springs on there...probably with the original dampers which could be why the ride was so harsh. Never mind new springs and new shocks was probably a good idea not to mention the M030 antiroll bars which definitely weren't on there previously! Has anyone managed lower than this?

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.