15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHQuickshift
Leading reported evidence
Install by them too
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Install by them too' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Install by them too' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I changed for the reason Adrien mentioned but didn't want the B&M's reduction or the Manthey cost...
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
If so, what are your feelings now and did you change the cables as you were planning ?
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T165820Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
The Porsche one is made of plastic and is liable to disintegrate. I've seen this happen twice, and both at the worst possible time. Luckily, the drivers escaped unhurt as the car coasted to a halt.
There are better made short shifters out there, but the action varies. The B&M one has a very short throw (-35%) and is made of metal... some say the throw is too short. I have the Manthey one (-23%) and is made of billet aluminium - I find it just right.
Neither are as cheap as the Porsche plastic one though.
:lol: :lol: Point taken, although answers following yours by Polar are the reason I like to get upto date answers to questions.
Thanks Polar, do you happen to know a rough price for the Manthey one and did you fit yourself !
I've got an EVOMS which is -20%, once the car has warmed up the action feels really nice, can be a bit stiff when cold though. I changed for the reason Adrien mentioned but didn't want the B&M's reduction or the Manthey cost...
If you check the 'garage' section you can see other forum members cars and what mods they've done. Usually they'll list prices and where they were purchased/ installed. That's what I've done and has been a very, very helpfull resource.
Thanks for that Damian, very interesting ! Perhaps I should put Shortshift in the search next time as Quickshift brought up 2 and 1 of them was mine
Have you still got the 997 shift fitted now ? If so, what are your feelings now and did you change the cables as you were planning ?
Exactly, don't thing a '99 C4 warrented such race engineering, then again as Adrien as noted in another post ''buy cheap, buy twice'' (I like that saying...) :twisted:
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
