13 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHAnother nice rear.
Leading reported evidence
Adjust slightly
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Drivers side exhaust tip needs adjusting slightly and then it would be 101%
Leading evidence: 'Adjust slightly' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Adjust slightly' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T130754Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Yup - which version of the 911 rear end is always a matter of debate, we all like our own (no that doesn't sound right) :grin:
I like the 991 but I'm biassed (not that I have the duck tail)...but this (or butt this?)
Can't really argue with a 996 C4S rear. 👌
GT3 whole other beast, and what's not to like.
The 997.1 C4S lost the reflector, and I don't think the 997.2 reflector is anywhere near as good looking as the 996.
Here's my 997.1 C4S rear, with different decklids.
Great thread. Hard to pin down an absolute favourite....
This showed up at work 2 days ago - quite special..
This is a colleague's touring - which I also love. .Menacing.
Also in the car park - this E which has a beautiful rear...
My current car - (agree with the OP here.....)
But I've always loved the widebody 993 S cars - it's gotta be this for me as my ultimate 911 fetish..
My black 993 2s is hard to beat (for me)...I miss it.
Although I do love my original air-cooled back end as well...
I think this is a classic rear look as well. I wish I'd bought this one. late '98 car on a 'R' plate. One of the last off the line. Perfect spec. in 2008 he wanted £36k and I was at £33k. Thought it was too much. Only one I've ever seen in Mirage Silver. Looks better in the flesh. Def the one that got away. Great rear tho...
