13 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHFacelift .v. Preface lift - The Difference
Leading reported evidence
Check done
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Let us know how you get on and also make sure you get a 111 point check done before commitment and a Porsche warranty is the best for more cover in my opinion.
Leading evidence: 'Check done' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check done' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Recommend many, I took 12 months before I bought having spent many an hour looking in private sales, indies etc.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I would have thought that the move from 3.4 to 3.6 was quite a significant change, not just the small power hike, but mainly the possbly more reliable engines less prone to cylinder warp and cracking?
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Got a test drive booked Friday, trying to stay calm about it but its difficult - and I am 48 going on 12...!!!!
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Check done
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Let us know how you get on and also make sure you get a 111 point check done before commitment and a Porsche warranty is the best for more cover in my opinion.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I would have thought that the move from 3.4 to 3.6 was quite a significant change, not just the small power hike, but mainly the possbly more reliable engines less prone to cylinder warp and cracking?
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T191851Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I am close to joining those who own a 996. Only get once chance in life, it's now takeable (is that a word) and I don't want to go to the great car park in the sky regretting I never took that chance.
The question today is what is the difference between face and pre face lift cars. Is it the lights, interior?.
I see people asking if you can retro fit Litronic or Xenons to a pre face lift. Does that mean all facelifts have them or were they an option. (Option on a 65k car, don't you just love it)
Any other advice would be great. Got a test drive booked Friday, trying to stay calm about it but its difficult - and I am 48 going on 12...!!!!
All the changes for the 2002 MY 3.6 litre facelift are right here, a total of 20 changes
http://911uk.com/viewtopic.php?t=15829
in the 996 FAQ section
http://www.911uk.com/viewforum.php?f=33
Hi,
The most obvious change is the head lights, note mine (face lift), preface lift lights do not have the sexy curve under light it is a staight line in effect.
Personally like the 996 face lift lights over the 997 lights.
Welcome and enjoy your test drives. Recommend many, I took 12 months before I bought having spent many an hour looking in private sales, indies etc. Eventually bought at an OPC spent a bit more but happy with the hospitality I have had.
Let us know how you get on and also make sure you get a 111 point check done before commitment and a Porsche warranty is the best for more cover in my opinion.
Regards Alan.
Me too. Some how the rounder lights just havent 'worked' yet for me. Bit like those open mouthed Audi grills. I know its historically 'right' but something not quite right about it aesthetically in my humble opinion. The facelifted look seems to flow better somehow, in keeping with the general flowing line of the car.
Styling is a very personal thing - I actually prefer the pre-facelift headlights myself (as long as they have clear indicator lenses :shock: )
I also prefer the pre-facelift (Mk1 GT3) aerokit: Hence my choice of car!
Facelift cars do have an extra 20bhp and a glovebox though... :wink:
I like the pre-face lights as well and the design of the front PU. Did the extra 20bhp really make a difference in real terms on the facelift cars? It was only approx a 6% increase anyway.
As said above, its a style thing... I always preferred the pre-face lift until I owned a C4S!
The 3.6 engine does have a few more BHP and torques, and feels a bit more muscly throughout. Not a lot in it TBH, but better fuel economy for what its worth!
And don't forget the cupholders too :roll:
The Litronics/Xenons are an option as you say, amazing on a £65k car), but as is a rear wiper, and the priviledge of having the Porsche Crest on the seat!
You can fit aftermarket HID Xenon lights and ballasts (as I did), but retrofitting OE Litronics is v expensive.
Or you could get the best of both worlds. Find a 3.4L with the X51 pack bringing it up to same bhp and torque as the 3.6L... then get one of those clip on cup holders
I would have thought that the move from 3.4 to 3.6 was quite a significant change, not just the small power hike, but mainly the possbly more reliable engines less prone to cylinder warp and cracking?
Did Porsche design the 3.6 with the objective of resolving early engine problems? The 3.4 engine problems didn't appear until a couple of years later... Also, I'm still not convinced that this really was a problem? Was it just magnification of the isolated few stories that were publicised?
I don't think Porsche built the 3.6 to solve the alleged problems with the 3.4, I am sure that it was a natural evolution. In reality who knows, apart from Porsche, if there really is an issue with the 3.4. Having said that and read various copy on the issue, if it were my money, I would go for the 3.6 just to hedge my bets.
You are right about the magnification effect though!
The 3.6 has a much better top end response and reach compared to the 3.4 and hence feels faster at higher speed, the 3.4 counters with subjectively better bottom end torque.
I had a 3.6 c2 and now have a 3.4 c4 and prefere the 3.6 on the whole but the difference isnt massive.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.