fullymatted.
Back to search
911uk

Thieving gits

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHThieving gits

Leading reported evidence

Replace these

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

These were replaced under warranty.

Thieving gits
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace these' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace these' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 12 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 2 other evidence results

Set from an opc

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Way cheaper than a set from an OPC.

Thieving gits

Use screwdriver

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

It is possible I suppose, but it seems highly unlikely since when I came to remove the remaining two I needed to use a screwdriver.

Thieving gits
Frequently discussed actions (3)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace these

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

These were replaced under warranty.

Thieving gits

Set from an opc

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Way cheaper than a set from an OPC.

Thieving gits

Use screwdriver

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

It is possible I suppose, but it seems highly unlikely since when I came to remove the remaining two I needed to use a screwdriver.

Thieving gits
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • 911uk: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T174436Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Only had my new 996 tts for one week and some cretin pinched one of the wheel centre badges (coloured metal types - just stuck on). Managed to get a replacement on Ebay, went to put it on, and what the heck, another one's gone! So I've taken them all off. Doesn't look as good. But can't be doing with them going missing all the time.

POST 3Original post

Are you absolutely certain they are being stolen :?: I've had 3 fall off :!:

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

It is possible I suppose, but it seems highly unlikely since when I came to remove the remaining two I needed to use a screwdriver. Also two to fall off in one week :!:

POST 5Original post

Nope, honestly, 2 of mine were on fine, the third OK, the fourth has never even come loose........2 of mine fell off within a fortnight (I blame the roads of Suffolk!), so I'd stick them back on (with loads of glue) and make the car look cool again

POST 6 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I am tempted to put them back. You can fix them with two small screws rather than glue. But if it is theives, which I still tend to think it is, then they will nick the whole centre cap and they're £45 each from an OPC.

POST 7Original post

I lost 3 badges from brand new wheel centers last winter on a trip back from Brittany. These were replaced under warranty. You can obtain the badges to glue back on yourself. Way cheaper than a set from an OPC. This IS more common than Porsche will admit, especially during the cold wet months.

POST 8Original post

Also had the same problem recently and got replacement badge for £9.50 from Germany off Ebay from fine-porsche or the complete centre hub from http://www.design911.co.uk/index.htm?Region=UK for £40.00. There wasn't much glue holding the originals on so I am assuming mine just came loose. TB

POST 9Original post

just had my porsche valve caps nicked last week. thieving bar stewards

POST 10Original post

The little shields have a reputation for dropping off. I had one on the garage floor once with the Targa. It's no surprise because they are just stuck on to the bare plastic. If you want them to stick, scratch the plastic of the cap and the back of the badge - it gives the glue somethiong to key to. I seriously doubt someone is nicking them.

POST 11Original post

As others have said the metal badges are prone to falling off in no time. The best thing to do is remove the badge and any residual glue and restick them with windscreen adhesive or something like Sikaflex - you need a glue that stays rubbery and slightly flexible rather than rock hard. Worth doing to new ones before you lose the badge!

POST 12 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Right then, it seems the consensus is that the badges are falling off rather than being stolen. So I've put them back but this time secured with two M2.5 screws, so they can't fall off. Let's see if the whole centre cap goes awol this time!

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.