20 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCayman S 987 Gen 2 — track day geometry? - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Leading reported evidence
Check /done next week in readiness
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I'm getting my geometry checked/done next week in readiness for a track day.
Cayman S 987 Gen 2 — track day geometry? - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Check /done next week in readiness' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Adjust front camber up' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
Once the Camber had been changed I was able to run 32F and 35R which gave a good balance on the shorter UK circuits
Cayman S 987 Gen 2 — track day geometry? - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Adjust front camber up
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
This will mean adjusting the front camber up to around -1 degree by moving the top mounts inwards.
Cayman S 987 Gen 2 — track day geometry? - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Adjust tyre pressures during the day as they get hotter
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Not sure if you've been on lots of track days or not, but the biggest effect on the car's handling you can have on the day is to adjust the tyre pressures during the day as they get hotter.
Cayman S 987 Gen 2 — track day geometry? - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Replace camber enough
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Firstly as mentioned , the stock suspension wont let you change the camber enough to stop the outside edge wear.
Cayman S 987 Gen 2 — track day geometry? - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Adjust tyre pressures during the day as they get hotter
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Not sure if you've been on lots of track days or not, but the biggest effect on the car's handling you can have on the day is to adjust the tyre pressures during the day as they get hotter.
Cayman S 987 Gen 2 — track day geometry? - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
20 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
PistonHeads: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T022239Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I'm getting my geometry checked/done next week in readiness for a track day.
The question was asked "road or track geometry"
I have PASM.
Opinions on this?
James
You cannot get a track geo with stock parts,
Just get them to max out the movment available in the top mounts have no front toe and fit some front spacers.
jcarruthers said:
I'm getting my geometry checked/done next week in readiness for a track day.
The question was asked "road or track geometry"
I have PASM.
Opinions on this?
James
There isn't a lot of adjustment possible on the 987S, but I'd be inclined to ask your garage to set it up for track. This will mean adjusting the front camber up to around -1 degree by moving the top mounts inwards. Make sure front toe is parallel. The downside of track geometry is that your car may feel a little more busy on the road (due to the increased front negative camber), but you may prefer it..?
Not sure if you've been on lots of track days or not, but the biggest effect on the car's handling you can have on the day is to adjust the tyre pressures during the day as they get hotter. Just remember to re-inflate them before you drive home..!
I don't know whether this can be done for a 987 but for both my 986 the top mount slots have been drilled/ground out by a further ~5mm. This allows you some extra negative camber. My current car runs a little over -2 deg at the front like this.
..and on the subject of tyre pressures, I'm about to track my Michelin-shod 987S for the first time so without prior experience was going to start with standard road pressures and then take it from there - interested to hear others opinions on what presures they've found to work well?
I find with my 987S which is also Michelin shod that starting on stock pressures (32 F, 36 R) is fine, but after about 3 to 4 laps (depending upon track length), you need to drop them back down as they rise quite a bit.
IREvans said:
There isn't a lot of adjustment possible on the 987S, but I'd be inclined to ask your garage to set it up for track. This will mean adjusting the front camber up to around -1 degree by moving the top mounts inwards. Make sure front toe is parallel. The downside of track geometry is that your car may feel a little more busy on the road (due to the increased front negative camber), but you may prefer it..?
Thanks for the above, but what about the rear settings, leave at stock?
You will kill the outside of the tyres, the stock cars roll and you cannot combat all that with camber.
Stock pressures on the R is 30/31 any way so much lower than the 36 talked about.
Also don't drop them 1st you will scrub the tyres, go out for a few laps come in and then drop them.
vee5 said:
Thanks Trev450. Do you find that dropping hot tyres to "cold" pressure values avoids too much damage to the outside of the tyre?
As mrdemon says, you won't avoid destroying the outer edges, but dropping to cold pressures afer a few laps will allow you to stay out longer before the tyres 'go off'.
mrdemon said:
Not sure, my mates cayman s is listed as 30/31 also it seems porsche dropped them a lot
Spyders also 30/31
Is that a 987.2 as well? Mine's a 987'1 and the pressures given on the inside of the door slam are definately 32F, 37R.
mrdemon said:
Yes his is a gen 2 ,
What's your wear like ? If it' s a bit bolder in the middle try a few psi lower.
No the rears wear very evenly across the whole width. The fronts as we've already established destroy ther outer shoulder, but apart from that they wear evenly too.
Thanks all for your replies.
@IREvans — I've always set up my (classic) cars with more camber on the front so that works for me. My worry is tyre wear when most of the mileage is going to be road. Not too worried about slightly more twitchy handling. I've done quite a few track days now — I have a tyre pressure gauge and IR temp gun at the ready. I usually drop them down only a couple of PSI before going out if the ambient temp is reasonable as in the past I've always had them warming up fairly quickly. I'm interested to see how helpful the TPMS is!
@mrdemon — my 987.2 is 32 and 34 on 19" wheels (I think!) — pretty sure none of the pressures are as low as you're stating.
Edited by jcarruthers on Saturday 12th July 09:33
I tracked my CR and made some changes to mitigate the outside shoulders getting a hammering. Firstly as mentioned , the stock suspension wont let you change the camber enough to stop the outside edge wear. Modifications to the top mount can be made but even when that is maxed out it still is not really enough if you are pushing on track. Modifications can be made at the lower end of the suspension and new Lower Coffin Arms which are adjustable can be fitted but they are far more expensive than a simple "Dremel and Geo" job !However they will allow much more adjustment to the track setup.
I went the top mount route which is pretty invisible to all but the geekiest of Porsche experts and didnt want to ruin the on road handling - I was after a compromise that meant I didnt have to put 2 new tyres on it after every trackday !
Mine was MPSS shod and at Spa I played with the pressures and found the following results. All these pressures are hot pressures and enabled the tyres to "stay in shape" rather than deform and roll onto the shoulder increasing the rate of wear. This was with std geo.
40F 40R - Understeery
40F 38R - neutral
40F 37R - oversteery
I also found that 38 front and back hot gave more traction and the car was neutral in handling but I could see the wear starting to happen.
Once the Camber had been changed I was able to run 32F and 35R which gave a good balance on the shorter UK circuits
Hope that helps and gives you food for thought
Far Cough said:
I tracked my CR and made some changes to mitigate the outside shoulders getting a hammering. Firstly as mentioned , the stock suspension wont let you change the camber enough to stop the outside edge wear. Modifications to the top mount can be made but even when that is maxed out it still is not really enough if you are pushing on track. Modifications can be made at the lower end of the suspension and new Lower Coffin Arms which are adjustable can be fitted but they are far more expensive than a simple "Dremel and Geo" job !However they will allow much more adjustment to the track setup.
I went the top mount route which is pretty invisible to all but the geekiest of Porsche experts and didnt want to ruin the on road handling - I was after a compromise that meant I didnt have to put 2 new tyres on it after every trackday !
Mine was MPSS shod and at Spa I played with the pressures and found the following results. All these pressures are hot pressures and enabled the tyres to "stay in shape" rather than deform and roll onto the shoulder increasing the rate of wear. This was with std geo.
40F 40R - Understeery
40F 38R - neutral
40F 37R - oversteery
I also found that 38 front and back hot gave more traction and the car was neutral in handling but I could see the wear starting to happen.
Once the Camber had been changed I was able to run 32F and 35R which gave a good balance on the shorter UK circuits
Hope that helps and gives you food for thought
Thanks for all this. How many degrees of camber are you running?
I have heard of using GT3 LCA — do they allow adjustment?
jcarruthers said:
Thanks for all this. How many degrees of camber are you running?
I have heard of using GT3 LCA — do they allow adjustment?
I managed to get just about -2 degrees on the front after the modification to the top mount. You are limited on one side by the presence of a bulkhead so although in theory one will go more they need to be the same each side and the limiting factor is how far you get elongate the slot.
This setting hardly made any difference to the road manners or showed any increase on the inside of the tyre. If I was pushed I would say the front end was more pointy but not the extent it would throw you into the ditch on a bumpy road.
The cost of this was approximately half the cost of one RSS adjustable coffin arm !! and I could have gone further by adding wheel spacers but didnt feel the need too. The result was unchanged road handling and less wear on the front tyres when on track which was the compromise I was after.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.