Rennlist

Durametric issue

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

3 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHDurametric issue

Leading reported evidence

Run durametric

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I ran Durametric to do some basic error code checks and corrections about a year ago, and it worked well for that.I am now wanting to check some actual values, but I get blank black boxes.
Original post Read captured discussion
Durametric issue
Outcome qualification: Negation, uncertainty or missing explicit repair resolution overrides the raw extraction signal.

Frequently discussed work

Check some actual values

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster
ago, and it worked well for that.I am now wanting to check some actual values, but I get blank black boxes.
Original post Read captured discussion
Durametric issue

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Run durametric' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check some actual values' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 3 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Check some actual values

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster
ago, and it worked well for that.I am now wanting to check some actual values, but I get blank black boxes.
Original post Read captured discussion
Durametric issue

Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Check some actual values

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster
ago, and it worked well for that.I am now wanting to check some actual values, but I get blank black boxes.
Original post Read captured discussion
Durametric issue

Run durametric

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I ran Durametric to do some basic error code checks and corrections about a year ago, and it worked well for that.I am now wanting to check some actual values, but I get blank black boxes.
Original post Read captured discussion
Durametric issue
Outcome qualification: Negation, uncertainty or missing explicit repair resolution overrides the raw extraction signal.

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

3 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 1 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T124918Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Guys, not sure if this is a good place to ask this but here�s what is happening. I ran Durametric to do some basic error code checks and corrections about a year ago, and it worked well for that.I am now wanting to check some actual values, but I get blank black boxes. Also when I first open the program, I get a message saying that the data cable firmware needs to be updated, and it appears to do that, program starts, but no actual values show. Tried a couple of different usb cables, and the green light on the old interface is on steady. Any ideas here would be appreciated!!

POST 2Original post

Contact Durametric. My unit went bad not long after I got it. They gave me a checklist to test it out and ended up replacing it.

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 19658541

Thanks�. I read earlier reports about lack of support from them, so thought I�d throw this out here first�� I�ll give them a shout�

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.