22 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHInsurance with garanteed value
Leading reported evidence
Replace grey 924s
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I've just renewed grey 924S with Norton Insurance -(been with them several years) fully comp-£50 excess-3K miles pa agreed value (sent 6 new jpegs) £2500 for £126.36 down from standard renewal figure of £178 when I said I was looking to save money & compare the market gave me £144.68 with a branch of Lancaster Insurance--2 named drivers .
Leading evidence: 'Replace grey 924s' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace grey 924s' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I used Priviledge once on my C2, and found them to be fine when it came to a claim.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Hi guys, as above who do you use for agreed valuation on your car(s)?
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Replace grey 924s
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I've just renewed grey 924S with Norton Insurance -(been with them several years) fully comp-£50 excess-3K miles pa agreed value (sent 6 new jpegs) £2500 for £126.36 down from standard renewal figure of £178 when I said I was looking to save money & compare the market gave me £144.68 with a branch of Lancaster Insurance--2 named drivers .
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
22 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T033922Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi guys, as above who do you use for agreed valuation on your car(s)? Ive just had a ridiculous quote from adrian flux and im thinking its time to shop around.
Cheers
Chris
Classic Line Insurance Tel no 01455 639000. I have had my 996C4S with them for 3 years now best prices for Greater London post code and agreed value with 5000 miles. Also discount for PCGB members.[
]
Ring them and try. I have to pay substantially more for 7K over the 5 or 6K I've had before though.
Also try the Club scheme with Locktons, it's getting some good feedback.
One thing (good) with Classic Line - they accepted, with a few photos, the PCGB valuation of my car as the agreed insured value. Also my excess with them is only £100, compared to £350-500 on other quotes I got. I've been with Classic Line for a few years now, not had to claim (touches wood rapidly!!) so can't comment on that side of life, but otherwise I have no reason to complain about their service.
I've got a multi-car policy with Admiral. The Focus (1.8 diesel) and the C4S are £800 for the pair for the year. I had a claim in 2011 and have attended a speed awareness course (no other points though).
I've just renewed grey 924S with Norton Insurance -(been with them several years) fully comp-£50 excess-3K miles pa agreed value (sent 6 new jpegs) £2500 for £126.36 down from standard renewal figure of £178 when I said I was looking to save money & compare the market gave me £144.68 with a branch of Lancaster Insurance--2 named drivers .
I've had a look and I've got a couple of issues so far. 1 seemingly non of the regular companies do garanteed, the ones that do charge a hefty premium. 2 I spent my whole lunchtime of 45 mins just to fill out 4 quotes 3 of which said well ring you, being of the newer generation I would rather do things online as there is far less chance of mistakes due to call centre workers not listening. 3 I think doing circa 10000 a year puts companies off and 4 I'm only 27 so a couple of places won't touch me with a barge pole. My cheapest quote so far is with privilege at £427 whiuch is quite good. It's an estimated at £32,000 (which is what the club habe valued it at) so I'm not sure whether to stick with estimated of find somewhere that dies guarantied. Any thoughts are welcome.
I had problems with an agreed-value policy at first, just because the car isn't garaged. It's a case of hunting around for an insurer who you fit with, as other people's recommendations mean nothing if your circumstances are different. Classicline were the only one that would cover me that first year.
"Classic" policies are designed to be just that: a pampered, weekend car rather than one that's regularly used. Doesn't mean you won't find someone to offer 10K miles, just you might have to trawl lots of companies. [&o]
I used Priviledge once on my C2, and found them to be fine when it came to a claim. However, with most "regular" insurers you might put in what you think is the correct value when you do a quote, but I doubt they will pay out anything other than what they consider to be a market value in the event of a total loss.
As Paul says, the majority of classic policies are for lower mileage pampered weekenders, so you will have to find one which will consider a daily drive, 10,000 mile p.a., 12 y.o. car as a classic. Of course, we know they are, but most insurers will think otherwise. Therefore you are likely to have to pay the premium for specialist cover.
I found Locktons (PCGB insurer) efficient and good value for a limited mileage policy - their quote was marginally cheaper than the previous insurer, and - importantly for me - I could keep it on my driveway instead of garaging it with a friend half a mile away.
I did have to provide a valuation letter, which I obtained from a local Porsche specialist (at a cost of fifty quid as I was in a big hurry), but they were happy with that. Also, you get extra drivers and track day cover.
Cheers, Geoff
Sorry for the delayed reply, Chris. They don't offer a guaranteed value...... but...... When I had a mishap with an old car (also with Admiral) they made an offer of settlement. Not content with this I did some research, pulled cars from Forums and Autotrader and sent a comprehensive pack of information to them explaining it was an 'enthusiasts' car and as such I would never take trade value for it at sale, would always sell privately etc. They gave me what I was asking for plus an additional £500.
Perhaps a degree of risk from what you are looking for but achievable nonetheless.
I think that's the sensible thing to do in your case Chris.
I had a similar experience to Mark, when my daughter wrote her first car off. I trawled AutoTrader and was able to show the insurer that I couldn't buy a replacement of comparable condition, age, and mileage for the settlement offer. They upped it to the correct value after that.