10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHRear ABS reluctor ring
Leading reported evidence
Check code and it directed me towards the os rear
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I checked the code and it directed me towards the OS rear.
Leading evidence: 'Check code and it directed me towards the os rear' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check code and it directed me towards the os rear' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I then moved on to visually inspect the reluctor ring.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I found some details on this forum on how to change a front reluctor ring, but nothing for the rear.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T203514Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hello - looking for some advise please.
I had my ABS warning light come one a while back. I checked the code and it directed me towards the OS rear. I tested the sensor which tested out as OK. I then moved on to visually inspect the reluctor ring. Through the small point where you can see the ring it looked very dirty and in one spot the ring was broken to one side. I cleaned it up as best as I could and since then it has mostly OK with the warning coming back on once only.
My plan was to change the ring when I do a suspension refresh. That time has now arrived. When ordering all the components I have discovered that the rear reluctor ring is part of the drive shaft. Desgn911 and Porsche have both said that I need a whole drive shaft.
I found some details on this forum on how to change a front reluctor ring, but nothing for the rear.
What are other's experiences please? Do I really need a new drive shaft at just under £1K...? FYI my car is a gen 2 C2.
Many thanks, Graham.
I've changed the rear. Whoever says you need a new drive shaft is talking nonsense.
This was the one I bought but currently out of stock:
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/201034990016
£7.99!!
These are £6.99:
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/185465750048
ok - apologies, I need some more help. Does anyone know if the C4 and C2 rear drive shaft reluctor ring are there same or not?
The bay site Alex pointed me to says they are not. But I want to hear it from the experts.
many thanks, Graham.
The 2nd link I posted states:
Engine Sizes : 3.4, 3.6,
Porsche 911 Petrol Targa RWD -- 996
Porsche 911 Petrol Coupe RWD -- 996
Porsche 911 Petrol Coupe AWD -- 996
Porsche 911 Petrol Convertible RWD -- 996
Porsche 911 Petrol Convertible AWD -- 996
:dont know:
OK - reluctorings are in hand. Sourced from reluctorring.com - thanks for the recommendation. Turned out they are in the same town where I live. Will let you know how I get on fitting them next week, along with all suspension components as well...
Quick bit of feedback on the reluctor ring supplier I used. They were excellent and were very easy to fit. Unlike all the suspension components I also had to fit. The usual seized eccentric bolts that needed cutting and some very stuck ball joints on the front. Of to CG for alignment on Friday
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
