fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

M030

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
6 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHM030

Leading reported evidence

Run concurrently

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

A lot of times there are similar topics running concurrently on both forums.

M030
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Run concurrently' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run concurrently' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 6 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 2 other evidence results

Use same rates

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

The C4s and turbos use the same rates, but the GT2 is difference because its RWD and lighter.

M030

Use same roll bars

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

FWIW the X73/74 packages are somewhere about 20% stiffer than the M030 counterparts, but they use the same roll bars.

M030
Frequently discussed actions (3)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run concurrently

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

A lot of times there are similar topics running concurrently on both forums.

M030

Use same rates

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

The C4s and turbos use the same rates, but the GT2 is difference because its RWD and lighter.

M030

Use same roll bars

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

FWIW the X73/74 packages are somewhere about 20% stiffer than the M030 counterparts, but they use the same roll bars.

M030
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

6 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T044418Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I read this on 6speedonline but I can't respond their for some reason so I thought I would ask here. Original post by Kevin H. in Atl the M030 is a factory sport suspension. The ROW M030 has shorter springs than US M030, ~-20mm front and -10mm rear, but with the same rates. Stabilizer bars are the same. Shocks are different. Here is a listing of the differences from US standard suspension: US M030 Sport Suspension Front Stabilizer 9.58% stiffer Rear Stabilizer 24.15% stiffer Front Springs 16.6% stiffer Rear Springs 28.2% stiffer Front Shocks (rebound) 21.1% softer Front Shocks (compression) 13.7% softer Rear Shocks (rebound) 26.1% stiffer Rear Shocks (compression) Same ROW M030 Sport Suspension Front Stabilizer 9.58% stiffer Rear Stabilizer 24.15% stiffer Front Springs 16.6% stiffer Rear Springs 28.2% stiffer Front Shocks (rebound) 8.1% stiffer Front Shocks (compression) 9.6% softer Rear Shocks (rebound) 36.1% stiffer Rear Shocks (compression) 15.2% stiffer Where can I find these numbers as compared to the standard Turbo suspension

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Good idea but is it ok to post in two places

POST 4Original post

Yes. I post in the 996 and 997 forums all of the time. A lot of times there are similar topics running concurrently on both forums. In fact, on Friday someone had questions about Leasing cars on the 996 forum. Then about an hour later someone on the 997 forum started a very similar thread. I was able to refer the 997 guy to the 996 thread to get some of his questions answered.

POST 5Original post

Is there a C2 vs. C4 M030 suspension? In my preliminary reading, I see that there is a Turbo/C4S vs. Narrowbody X73/X74 difference. I'm assuming there is also a Turbo/C4S vs. Narrowbody M030 difference as well. But what I'm more interested in is whether or not the C2 and C4 are suspended differently with these sport suspension. In looking at the PSS9 from Bilstein, they seem to have two separate part numbers for the C2 and the C4. Does anyone know what the salient differences are between the two? Thanks, David

POST 6Original post

There is little to no point in comparing the differences between the turbo, C4 and a C2. There is a vast difference in weight and that will be the most significance difference in the spring rates, shock valving, rollbar diameter; which has to accomidate the weight. Not to mention the C4 and C2 are different weight balance front to rear and the chassis is more reinforced on the C4. The C4s and turbos use the same rates, but the GT2 is difference because its RWD and lighter. The GT3 is a completetly different animal as its more of a race set up. The parts are also different on all of the AWD cars as they are designed to have power to the front wheels which can cause understeer. This will alter setup to accomidate for this. The bottom line is comparing the suspension for the AWD cars to RWD cars in not useful because the dynamics of each cars are different and mixing and matching won't work. Its more useful to compare C4 to C4S rates and comparing AWD sport to non sport rates. FWIW the X73/74 packages are somewhere about 20% stiffer than the M030 counterparts, but they use the same roll bars.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.