12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHnew member AND owner
Leading reported evidence
Replace obviously
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
As far Peter Morgan goes, the report was fantastic, very detailed, both him and Gordon ( the eng who did the check ) were great chaps to talk with - very helpfull, good timmings, very professional.
Leading evidence: 'Replace obviously' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check ) were great chaps' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
As far Peter Morgan goes, the report was fantastic, very detailed, both him and Gordon ( the eng who did the check ) were great chaps to talk with - very helpfull, good timmings, very professional.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Tried a few C2, C4S, GT3, trips and manuals but in the end my heart was set on a 996tt.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Check ) were great chaps
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
As far Peter Morgan goes, the report was fantastic, very detailed, both him and Gordon ( the eng who did the check ) were great chaps to talk with - very helpfull, good timmings, very professional.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T074343Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Ah what a glorious day ! My first Porsche arrived!
Joined the PCGB few months ago ( well 19 months - lets say I looove Porsches ) and now waiting for the membership to go through to say full member. Also I amassed a good wealth of information and bugged all of you in a way or another with questions, which some guided me in the right direction and now my first Porsche is sitting on my driveway : a 996 turbo.
Tried a few C2, C4S, GT3, trips and manuals but in the end my heart was set on a 996tt.
What a car - the thing is a beast but very easy to drive. Be it in town or crusing along the motorway is civlized as any other car, floor it and you know you are inside something VERY special.
I wanted a LHD from the start ( long story ) and found a pristine example of it ( actually the car found me - the owner, a PCGB member,emailed me and we set the sale in a couple of weeks ) : super well taken care of, 10/10 in mechanics, always serviced in OPCs, still on extended warranty, owner a very nice chap, humongus pile of invoices.
Still, asked a PPI from Peter Morgan and he confirmed my initial findings : the car is a gem.
34k miles on the clock, 2002 model, all the toys, sports seats, lapis blue, 38k paid. Yes its a buyers market and I would problably could get the price a bit here and there. But since it really tick all the boxes and beyond, I didnt want to get it away.
Hope to meet you guys in a upcoming event !
Heres a picture of her ( all Porsches are ladys...
)
Mate of mine tried to grow some envy showing off his new fezza 360 but honestly ? I wouldnt trade.. Guess that Porsche taste is something that comes with your dna. Good taste I have to say
Very nice. Seems a good price to me based on ads Ive seen around. One day will swap mine for a tt but have been saving for a 50K min budget. Times have changed obviously.
Enjoy.
ps - were you pleased with the Peter Morgan report?
ahahahaha [
] well sorry for hearing that. each to each own
yap, to be fairly honest, this was a picture that was taken by its previous owner - im proud to say that she has shiny spotless feet now [
]
Cheers ! Yes, the price was fair to both I believe - the seller got it good and I got a very good car at a good price.
One thing I learned that is there is no such thing as a cheap Porsche. Buy cheap, buy twice.
50k seems quite a lot - for that you are aiming for a 2003 X50 car with low miles, even normal tt 2004.
As far Peter Morgan goes, the report was fantastic, very detailed, both him and Gordon ( the eng who did the check ) were great chaps to talk with - very helpfull, good timmings, very professional. Very impressed and happy with his PPI.
Cheers
