fullymatted.
Back to search
Planet-9

987 2005 2.7 Manual

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
9 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH987 2005 2.7 Manual

Leading reported evidence

Install with

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

your car is fitted with.

987 2005 2.7 Manual
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Install with' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'best way' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Install with' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 9 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Compare 2 other evidence results

best way

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

This is probably the best way to determine what you have.

987 2005 2.7 Manual

Replace without removing the engine and "breaking the case"

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

If the OP has the later, larger bearing, it cannot be replaced without removing the engine and "breaking the case".

987 2005 2.7 Manual
Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Install with

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

your car is fitted with.

987 2005 2.7 Manual

Replace without removing the engine and "breaking the case"

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

If the OP has the later, larger bearing, it cannot be replaced without removing the engine and "breaking the case".

987 2005 2.7 Manual
Reported and suspected causes (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

best way

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

This is probably the best way to determine what you have.

987 2005 2.7 Manual
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Planet-9: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 1 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T005001Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

I recently purchased a 987 with 48k miles. It’s really in beautiful shape and drives amazingly. The question I have is should I proactively replace the IMS ? I appreciate everyone’s input.

POST 2Original post

I also have the 2005, 2.7 manual and welcome!!! What is your manufacturing month / year? If a bit "later" (Apr, May, June?) in the year then you should be good. I got lucky and got one of the later ones (June, 2005) and has the bigger IMS with "1%" failure rate...

POST 3Original post

Hey, thanks for the response and details. I’m not sure of the manufacture month but I’m looking through the documentation the prior owner provided, the in-service date is June of ‘05 so my assumption is that the manufacturer date is going to be earlier. I’ll just need to keep an eye on it and hope for the best.

POST 4Original post

Congrats on the 987! Regarding the IMS , if it hasn’t been replaced or upgraded already, it might be worth considering the proactive replacement, especially if you plan to keep the car long-term. Many owners opt for an upgraded IMS bearing to mitigate potential issues. However, if you’re not experiencing any symptoms and the car has been well-maintained, some owners choose to monitor it and replace it if necessary. It really comes down to your peace of mind and long-term plans with the car.

POST 5Original post

Just to be clear, based on the excellent info provided by @Hoster987 , if the OP has the smaller, earlier bearing it can be replaced with one of the aftermarket ones (such as the LN Engineering product) that feature improved oiling. To do this requires removing the transaxle in order to access the bearing. The failure rate on this smaller bearing has been a cause for concern for quite some time but actual failure rates are hard to get a handle on. If the OP has the later, larger bearing, it cannot be replaced without removing the engine and "breaking the case". If you take this route, you just put in a new bearing of the same type and leave the inner grease seal off in order to obtain "splash lubrication". But in effect you are well on your way to a full rebuild. It is generally agreed the failure rate on these larger bearings is very low and based on the cost of doing the work, most choose to leave it as is. Many implement oil monitoring (Blackstone, etc.) as a way to keep an eye on engine health. If metal particles start to show up in the oil analysis, then you have to basically stop driving the car and plan on major engine work. I have found that if you show up at your local Porsche dealers parts counter, armed with your VIN, the parts guy can drill down and find the part number of the bearing that is appropriate for your car and engine. This is probably the best way to determine what you have. I'm fortunate to live close to a dealer but I suspect if you are some distance from one, they will provide this service over the phone.

POST 6Original post

@sammysammy - you've received some excellent advice above. One other factor in the decision you might consider is the resale value of the car with and without the bearing being replaced by one of the bearing cures marketed by various shops.. You probably will recover all your expenses in doing this since the prospective owners/buyers won't be concerned about the engine blowing up the day after they buy it. Now - about an introduction - it's tradition around Planet-9 that new members introduce themselves and their cars (with photos) - in the New Members Introduction forum. Please do so - we're a friendly group here.. and welcome to Planet-9, the Friendly Porsche Forum for people with Porsche questions.

POST 7Original post

The month and year of production should be on a sticker in the driver's door jamb. That will tell you the assembly date of the car, but the engine could be earlier than that. However, I'm sure there must be a non-invasive way of telling which IMS bearing your car is fitted with.

POST 8Original post

I paid for a VIN analysis report from vinalytics.com. They confirmed the build date of 3/05. I’ve made an appointment to get the ISM bearing replaced. Thanks everyone!

POST 9Original post

Just to be 110 percent, please check your engine number if you have a set of ramps or jack stands so you can crawl under....

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.