8 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHPleasant suprise! RMS
Leading reported evidence
Replace of attitude now
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Is this indeed a change of attitude now that sales are starting to slow down.
Leading evidence: 'Replace of attitude now' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace of attitude now' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
8 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T173940Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Took my wifes six year old Targa for an annual service and an MOT to local OPC. Collecting car told of items requiring maintenance including RMS. Last year they noticed it weeping and both times I said we will wait until either the clutch needs replacement or the weeping turns to a leak.
Suprised to be rung today to say they will do the work gratis with Porsche picking up 60% and the OPC 40%. I realise that as far as the OPC are concerned they are just giving a discount on their labour rates.
There generosity was explained as a reward for PCGB membership and long standing loyalty to the brand and OPC. Is Porsche changing as the economic tide turns?
Suprised of Brighton.
What odds do you think a bookmaker will offer against the following?: During RMS replacement you get a phone call advising that the clutch needs replacement![
]
It really did turn out to be FOC and no they didn't find any other faults whilst they replaced it.[
]
So I really should have gone down to the bookie.[&o]
That is a pleasant surprise and helps restore some faith back to the marque's poor customer service record. Is this indeed a change of attitude now that sales are starting to slow down. Well done to Porsche on this occasion.
(Yes, I do give praise where it's deserved)[
]
Is this Mid -Sussex Francis?
I have been rewarded with good customer care there recently. Nothing as grand as a FOC RMS I have to say but neverthelees good service.
RB
RMS repairs are being honoured by PCGB provided they have full Porsche service history - this is nothing new, been reported numerous times in last 4-5 months. Pity its taken 10 years of internet forum talk for them to finally concede there may be an issue that owners aren't happy with !
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
