10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHSquealing
Leading reported evidence
Install rs29 pagid yellows
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
DemonFish fitted RS29 Pagid Yellows on mine and they squeal too.
Leading evidence: 'Install rs29 pagid yellows' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Install rs29 pagid yellows' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
So I take the car to Wrightune today and although the OPC (Bolton) had replaced the pads all round (and new disks on the rear) they didn't put the anti squeal shims (Porsche call them someting else, I can't remember what) in there?!
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Having just had the pleasure of using Wrightune I would say that you could do a lot worse!
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
So I take the car to Wrightune today and although the OPC (Bolton) had replaced the pads all round (and new disks on the rear) they didn't put the anti squeal shims (Porsche call them someting else, I can't remember what) in there?!
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T130754Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I have a 911 that has new pads (done a few thousand ago by OPC Bolton), squeals like you wouldn't believe...would they perhaps not have renewed the anti squeal shims? It's really embarassing to be honest.. any ideas on how to resolve (before I go back to the OPC ) I bought the car recently so my OPC is Reading, although I hear Wrightune is a good place to go?Can I do something myself to stop it?
Bolton OPC have changed both rear discs and pads and more recently front discs and pads on mine. Rears have done about 15000 miles now and the front 4000 miles. I've never had a single squeal.
So I take the car to Wrightune today and although the OPC (Bolton) had replaced the pads all round (and new disks on the rear) they didn't put the anti squeal shims (Porsche call them someting else, I can't remember what) in there?! Tony at Wrightune had the front ones which he put in and I go back tomrrow for the rears as he didn't have themn and the car still squealed. I hope that cures it - if not we'll have to do some more investigation. I'll let you know.
How come as I am a PCGB member the web doesnt show me as one??
Hmmm. I won't comment about the brakes, but you can probably guess what I'm thinking! [
]
You need to contact the club office and get them to tie up your membership number with your forum name. The forum software won't do this automatically. Alternatively try a post here:
http://www.porscheclubgbforum.com/fb.asp?m=375913
as it seems to work.
Sounds like you need to send a stiff letter to OPC Bolton threatening legal action if they don't pay for a) your costs at Wrighttune and b) your time spent in rectifying the issue ...
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
