fullymatted.
Back to search
Porsche Club GB

how much anal should I by with OPC ?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
3 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHhow much anal should I by with OPC ?

Leading reported evidence

Replace control arms, front, both

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

OPC changed my control arms, front, both.

Original post Read captured discussion
how much anal should I by with OPC ?
Frequently discussed work

Check after fitting the new control arms

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I assume they did a full geometry check after fitting the new control arms ?

Original post Read captured discussion
how much anal should I by with OPC ?
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace control arms, front, both' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check after fitting the new control arms' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 3 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Check after fitting the new control arms

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I assume they did a full geometry check after fitting the new control arms ?

Original post Read captured discussion
how much anal should I by with OPC ?
Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Check after fitting the new control arms

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I assume they did a full geometry check after fitting the new control arms ?

Original post Read captured discussion
how much anal should I by with OPC ?

Replace control arms, front, both

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

OPC changed my control arms, front, both.

Original post Read captured discussion
how much anal should I by with OPC ?
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

3 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T161109Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

OPC changed my control arms, front, both. Problem was that they were squeaking and the noise was utterly annoying me - they found one of them to be loose and the other on the verge of breaking, so I decided to replace them. New problem is that I feel the car less planted and at very low speeds ( 5 to 7mph ) the car leans to the right. Also I get from time to time I get some hard turning when I get feisty on the brakes. Thing is - maybe this is normal and I had a perfectly setup car ? How anal should I be with OPC checking it ? The car drives well and only at very low speeds it is noticeable. I checked in the car for checking this tomorrow but Im afraid that they'll return the car on saturday and say "oh its normal".

POST 3Original post

I assume they did a full geometry check after fitting the new control arms ? If so they should have still on file their measurements, which should be in spec. If they haven't done the geometry then i suggest you go outside the OPC - for the same money Chris Franklin at Centre Gravity, or Parr motorsport will do a much better job.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.