fullymatted.
Back to search
Planet-9

Hopefully not covered but 2.9 EFI question

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
3 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHHopefully not covered but 2.9 EFI question

Leading reported evidence

Use 3.4l crank

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Or even using the 3.4L crank with the 2.9 sleeved up more.

Hopefully not covered but 2.9 EFI question
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use 3.4l crank' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use 3.4l crank' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 3 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Use same engine block

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I’ve seen that the 987.2 and 981 engines use the same engine block.

Hopefully not covered but 2.9 EFI question
Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Use 3.4l crank

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Or even using the 3.4L crank with the 2.9 sleeved up more.

Hopefully not covered but 2.9 EFI question

Use same engine block

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I’ve seen that the 987.2 and 981 engines use the same engine block.

Hopefully not covered but 2.9 EFI question
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

3 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Planet-9: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T152433Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

I have tried to search and not exactly sure what to call it. I’ve seen that the 987.2 and 981 engines use the same engine block. Does this count for the 2.9 also? I’ve only see one other person who asked about this on ********. Maybe I am missing something, since I cannot find much info and I’m rather late to the game. The 3.8 engine swap would be a phenomenal game changer. But at a lot of cost. Are we not able to have a 3.8 block and mount our 2.9 heads on it. Maybe with bigger valves, ported and polished with bigger injectors and a tube. Or even using the 3.4L crank with the 2.9 sleeved up more. Not much in this at all, and I see I am not the first to ask. I do understand it would not get the same power output. But just seems that would be an easier option. Maybe I am wrong idk. Anyone have any insight on this, or maybe the proper terminology for a search.

POST 2Original post

I tried to look into this a bit before and didn't find much. With the 987.2 both the 3.4 and 2.9 share the same stroke and the bore diameter makes up the displacement. These are closed deck blocks and from some of the pictures I saw of the 2.9 opened up it sure looks like plenty of room to go bigger. With that said I never opened a Porsche engine before but been intrigued with the 2.9 as you get them at a very reasonable price. Hopefully someone has some insight on the 2.9.

POST 3Original post

Yes pricing engines out the 2.9 and 2.0 from the 718 seem reasonably priced. I love boost, but I’m guess tackling putting the turbo engine in with the electronics would be a night mare. But I agree 2.9 seems like a good place to start from. I need to look into and find more specs. Everything is so vague or maybe I do not know a lot of the proper terminology. But does seem possible to make this happen and keep the efi heads with valve work, bigger injectors and cam or cams. I need to research much more also. Hopefully someone has attempted this or did it as you said and can give us some feed back.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.